posted by Jitendra
Mohan, Santa Clara, California, USA, 11 Jul 2002
Summary: Asian, male, 60, healthy active - mild MI, 99% blocked RCA - angiography done, but recommended to wait on angioplasty. My father had burning sensation in the chest and was diagnosed initially as angina, and then later on as MI (torporin (?) was high). He was not administered any clot-busters (p-TA ?). EF was probably around 50% in echo cardiogram. Echocardiogram showed Inferior hypokinesia. He got many heparin injections but was not continued with LMWH injections upon discharge. His ECG has been stable (but not completely normal) since. Since lipid profile was on the high side of 'normal'.
3 weeks after the incident he went in for an angiography (out of town - dr. recommended wait). 99% blockage in RCA (90% distal), LCX and LAD normal. EF 55%. The doctor diagnosed it as unstable angina. Despite the blockage, the dr. recommended him to wait for another three weeks and then proceed with a Thallium test. The doctor is waiting for the muscles to grow back of something like that.
I have read from various sites that remodeling of ventricles should be avoided as it increases the risk of electrical malfunction (VF ?) because of scar tissue formation. BTW, incident happened in India in a city where angiography was not available. Why is the doctor making him wait for three weeks before doing angioplasty? Can angioplasty be done with 99% blocked RCA? Really appreciate any advice.
Please note the following disclaimer: The information contained in this web site is accurate to the best of the knowledge of Angioplasty.Org. None of this information should be viewed as a substitute for medical advice or as a consultation with a medical doctor. It is highly recommended that readers discuss any advice with a medical doctor before deciding on a course of action. Angioplasty.Org or its producers assume no liability for any actions taken as a result of information contained on this site, whether implied or expressed. Opinions and recommendations expressed on the FORUM are solely those of their authors. All submissions are reviewed and posted at the editors' discretion. FORUM submissions that are primarily commercial in nature, advertising services or products, are not posted. Any medical advice expressed on the FORUM does not necessarily represent the views of Angioplasty.Org, its producers, or of anyone associated with it, or of others appearing on this web site. Please note that this is a moderated discussion, so your response will appear after a short review.
send comments & suggestions to "info at angioplasty
Angioplasty.Org is an editorially independent informational health