Bio-Engineered vs Bare Metal vs Drug-Eluting Stents

What are the merits of bio-engineered stents (BES) vs bare metal (BMS) or drug-eluting (DES)?

Current Postings (4):

• Desmond -- we are covering this new field (for example, this Forum Topic and various references in recent articles, including our October 4 feature, "Conor CoStar: New Stents May Be Solution to New Stent Problems"). We also are in the process of creating an entirely new section on "Emerging Technologies" which will have much more in depth information on these new devices. Actually, the TCT conference had a number of meetings on the new technologies, and they were very well-attended, so the word is definitely out. Sign up for our newsletter to get announcements of new sections, articles, etc.
Angioplasty.Org Staff, Angioplasty.Org, November 14, 2006

• In addition to bio-engineered stents, there have been quite a number of clinical trials involving bio-degradable stents, which means that the stent will revert to bare metal stents. Examples are Conor Medsystem (CE mark approved), Biosensors Int, Biomatrix (awaiting ce mark), Xtent, Devax, Nobori (from Terumo). I wish that your website will highlight more info from these new technologies, instead of always highlighting Taxus, Cypher, Endeavor, etc. For example, in the recently concluded TCT conference, hardly any mention was made of these new technologies - are they that passive? Are they not involved in the conference?
Desmond C., Singapore, November 11, 2006

• Suneil, given the controversy of the past couple months, cardiologists and patients alike are looking to the next generation of stents to solve some of the problems. There are several out there in research phases, clinical trials and some, like the stent your doctor mentioned, have achieved some approvals. The Genous stent works on a very interesting concept -- using a bio-coating on the surface not to suppress the growth of "scar tissue", which is what drug-eluting stents do, but rather to attract endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in the blood which will result in a natural and fast covering of the metallic stent. It's a new technology that received CE mark approval a little over a year ago, and is not yet available in the U.S. The positive side is that patients would not need to take long-term dual antiplatelet therapy and that hopefully the issue of late stent thrombosis, a very low-frequency but potentially catastrophic event, would not be an issue. Have any physicians or patients out there had experience with this or other new devices? Let us know.
Angioplasty.Org Staff, Angioplasty.Org, October 30, 2006

• 2 months back, my CT scan showed a 70% blockage in the LAD with a potential 50% (soft plaque) blockage in the Left Main and less than 50% in the right circumflex. We were against an angioplasty due to the Stent Controversy. With a significant change in lifestyle, my Cholesterol has recently been lowered to 98 mg with a HDL:LDL ratio of 1.08. My doctor advises an Angio is necessary for proper diagnosis - with the intent to do an Angioplasty if the blockage is more than 70%. However, if the major blockage involves the Left Main, a Bypass would be his recommendation. In case a stent is used, he suggests a bio engineered stent (BES???) called Genous. Marketing materials suggest this (BES) is a safer and more pragmatic option, but there is less than 12 months of data available. Is the data available adequate to form a reasonable opinion? What are their merits vs BMS vs DES. Are there any other factors we should be aware of with the use of Bio Engineered Stents? My procedure is being scheduled for next week.
Suneil, Singapore, October 30, 2006

The Cardiology Patient Forum needs your help...
Donate Now!

 

Click here for more information about these

 

add your response
Please keep your posting concise. For readability we limit responses to 1,200 characters. Also note that The Forum is not an "ask-a-doctor" service; we do not dispense medical
advice about a patient's specific situation. Read our disclaimer and note that no information
on this Forum should be viewed as a substitute for medical advice or as a consultation
with a medical doctor
: characters left

Forum name -- how do you want to be identified on your post (Required) your email address (Required):
email address must be current and valid; if email sent to the address
below is returned, your comments will not be posted; your email address
will not be displayed on the Forum unless you specifically request it: please enter your email address again (for verification)
geographic location (city, state, province and/or country -- Required):
REQUIRED -- Check the box below to let us know you are a "real human being" and not a spambot. You must check this box for your posting to be submitted: I am a real person and not a spambot The following information is optional. your name:

your organization:
Check the box below if you wish Angioplasty.Org to "anonymize" your posting (for example, John Doe, Baltimore, Maryland, USA would become John D., Maryland, USA): please anonymize me To submit your post, please click the button below once and wait for a confirmation.
Clicking more than once will result in multiple submissions.


Please note the following disclaimer: The information contained in this web site is accurate to the best of the knowledge of Angioplasty.Org. None of this information should be viewed as a substitute for medical advice or as a consultation with a medical doctor. It is highly recommended that readers discuss any advice with a medical doctor before deciding on a course of action. Angioplasty.Org or its producers assume no liability for any actions taken as a result of information contained on this site, whether implied or expressed. Opinions and recommendations expressed on the FORUM are solely those of their authors. All submissions are reviewed and posted at the editors' discretion. FORUM submissions that are primarily commercial in nature, advertising services or products, are not posted. Any medical advice expressed on the FORUM does not necessarily represent the views of Angioplasty.Org, its producers, or of anyone associated with it, or of others appearing on this web site. Please note that this is a moderated discussion, so your response will appear after a short review.



Angioplasty.Org Home   PatientCenter


send comments & suggestions to "info at angioplasty dot org"
Read our Privacy statement.

The Cardiology Patients' Forum
receives sole support from
reader contributions and sponsored search engine ads

Angioplasty.Org is an editorially independent informational health site
which has received unrestricted educational grants from
Medtronic plc, TCROSS NEWS, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Volcano Corporation, Terumo Medical Corporation
Cardium Therapeutics, Inc. and Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of NY

For more information, see About Us
All content, including text, photos and video
©Copyright Venture Digital LLC 1996-2017