|
|
November
29, 2005
Déjà Lu
I apologize for the continuing French references,
but it's just that the French have a word for it -- and today's is
a cousin of Déjà Vu (already seen); it's Déjà Lu
(already read).
I am referring to today's press release from Boston Scientific
or more correctly their PR firm, Hill & Knowlton. It is headlined: "TAXUS™ Stent
Demonstrates Excellent Efficacy and Safety in Independent 'STENT' Registry".
It is subtitled: "Trends Favour Boston Scientific's TAXUS Stent Over
J&J's Cypher in Interim 9-Month Data From Largest Independent DES Registry
in US". Following on the heels of this weekend's Taxus-touting Wall
Street Journal article, it looks like Boston's stent is suddenly gaining
a lot of positive momentum.
Except that today's press release is old news, literally
a reprint of their October
25 release with two small changes, both time-date references which
would reveal that the study had been presented (and touted) over a month
ago at the TCT meeting. And it follows an interesting article in yesterday's
Charlotte (North Carolina) Observer about the same study; it is titled "Drug-coated
stents equally effective" and quotes hometown Sanger Clinic cardiologist
Charles Simonton MD who actually ran the study. He states:
"These two stents are performing almost
identically.... There's no reason why an interventional cardiologist
ought to pick one over the other based on the way patients are
turning out."
Sigh! Who to believe....
(It's also a case of Déjà Écrit. "already
written", because I discussed this disparity in perceptions of the
STENT registry study data last
month.)
But cardiologists already know about all this stuff --
and by going to meetings like TCT, ACC, AHA and others, they are getting
very detailed info about the differences and similarities and outcomes
about these two drug-eluting stents, as well as other therapies. So the
audience for these "Stent War" vollies is not the medical community.
Here's a hint: the press release appears on the Yahoo! Finance boards.
|
|
|