|
|
February
28,
2007 -- 6:45pm EST
Argument Resurrected: Stents vs. Surgery
The front page of Sunday's New York Times
reported on the three-decade-old Celebrity
Deathmatch between surgeons and interventional cardiologists.
Titled, In
the Stent Era, Heart Bypasses Get a New Look, the article, by
reporter Barnaby Feder, postulated that, given the recent concerns
over drug-eluting stent problems, in some patients bypass surgery
may be a better solution than stents for
treating
the problem
of coronary artery disease.
But the
Times article left out a few problems associated with bypass surgery,
such as vein grafts closing up (they then get reopened
using...ahem...stents). Also there's a growing body of evidence that
many bypass patients experience "cognitive decline'. In the recent
5-year follow up of the Octopus study, 50% of the patients were classified
as having "cognitive decline", leading Yale-based MD Harlan Krumholz
to suggest that this risk be made part of the informed consent
for CABG patients.
And then there's Dana Carvey...but read the full
article....
|
|
|