|
|
November
8,
2007 -- 11:14 EST
Headline Writers Play "Telephone"
I've tagged these in past
columns as "Dreadlines"
-- an over-amplification of a news item (i.e. a distortion,
as in old
school "Heavy Metal"). But when you add misinformed medical
reporting to the "anything for a thrill" MO of the headline writers
at Fox News, you get things like this:
Super
X-Ray Drawing Controversy for
Super-Dose of Radiation
It's the game of "Telephone" -- you whisper a
message in the next person's ear and by the end of the line...well,
you get the idea.
That's exactly what happened to the study which I
discussed in Tuesday's
post. The CorE 64 trial, presented at the AHA this week,
proved the extremely high accuracy of Multislice CT in
ruling out coronary artery disease. To be sexy, AP dubbed it a
"Super X-Ray". But in the story was a completely
inaccurate line that the CT radiation dose was 10 times higher
than a standard angiogram. I disputed this in my post, and yesterday
an expert in the field, Dr. Michael Poon, President of the
Society for Cardiovascular
CT, confirmed to me that major studies
have shown the radiation dose from CT to be 1-2 times that of
a standard angiogram, and certainly the same as, if not less than,
the dose from
a nuclear stress test.
But facts shouldn't get in the way of selling papers
(or, in the case of Fox News, selling...um, what is it that they're
selling anyway?) So what started out on Monday as the scientific
presentation of a very successful randomized
clinical trial of Multislice CT, turned within 24 hours into the
totally fear-mongering headline above -- which is
great on Halloween, but not so much when people's healthcare is concerned.
|
|
|