The Voice in the Ear -- Burt's Stent Blog
<< To Blog Home >> Follow Burt on TWITTER
DVD Special Offer
"The Stent Blog is a must-read resource"
  -- ConcurringOpinions.com

Subscribe to
email alerts

 

January 19, 2009 -- 7:20pm EST

When Less is More: Stents, That Is
So many news reports about the recent FAME study in the New England Journal of Medicine drive home a message that is not exactly correct. The "Stents May Be Overused" headline is misleading. And here's why.

Yes, the FAME study did show that when FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) was used routinely to measure whether or not a coronary lesion was ischemic, less stents were implanted per patient, and the resulting decrease in major cardiac events was significant.

But stenting, as an important therapy, was never called into question. The patient population for the FAME study consisted of patients with multivessel disease -- and 94% of these patients had stents implanted. Yes, that's 94%! It's just that the number of stents per patient was lower, on the average: two stents instead of three.

Nico Pijls, MDIn fact Nico Pijls, the co-principal investigator for FAME, told Angioplasty.Org that, rather than reduce the total number of stents used, the use of FFR could easily expand the patient population that could benefit by stents. For example, patients with multiple blockages might only have only 2 that are measured as ischemic, and thus would be candidates for stenting, rather than surgery.

He characterized the FAME results as a refinement of stenting, and that they actually may expand the use of the procedure as well.

You can read Angioplasty.Org's exclusive interview with Dr. Pijls here.

« comment »        « back to top »

  Donate to this Site
Click here for more information about these