|
|
March
11,
2010 -- 10:10pm EST
Three Months of Plavix After Stent: When Less
May Be More
"All
stents are not the same," Dr. Fausto Feres told me in his
interview on Angioplasty.Org. He was talking about the OPTIMIZE
trial and why, even though everyone
else is testing 12 months or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy,
why his trial of over 3,000 patients is going in the opposite direction:
testing only three months.
A little background: from 2003-2006 patients
were given six months of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy
(DAPT, usually Plavix plus aspirin) after getting a
drug-eluting
stent to prevent blood clots (stent thrombosis) from
forming inside the stent. It was assumed that after six months, the
stent struts would be covered and thrombosis,
would not be an issue.
Then came "the
firestorm" of the 2006 European
Society of Cardiology meeting where
papers
were presented
showing a
risk of very late stent thrombosis six months, a year, two years
after stenting. The interventional community was thrown
into shock and this issue was debated in every meeting, culminating
in a two-day FDA panel on stent safety. Following this meeting,
new guidelines recommended 12 months minimum of DAPT and more,
if patients were not experiencing any adverse effects (bleeding
being the main one).
But, as Dr. Eric Topol told me in his
interview, this recommendation wasn't
based on scientific data, because there wasn't any -- it was an intuitive
decision that more DAPT would reduce this new found albeit infrequent
problem of late stent thrombosis.
So the idea of designing a 3,000-plus patient trial testing
whether three months of DAPT is sufficient goes against this intuitive
concept.
Well, things are different. in 2006 there were only two DES: Taxus
and Cypher. And Dr. Feres gives his patients 12 months of DAPT when
he uses those, except that he rarely uses those. Mostly he is using
the second-generation Endeavor stent from Medtronic which numerous
imaging studies have shown to "heal" more quickly. OCT imaging has
shown almost 100%
strut coverage at 3-6 months, even better than bare metal stents.
And Dr. Feres has been giving patients only three months of Plavix
and aspirin
with no problems so far. So the OPTIMIZE Trial, taking place in 30
centers in Brazil will see if there is any difference in three or
twelve months.
If three months turns out to be "as good", it will actually
be "better" and here's why. Plavix costs $4/day. That's $1,100 per
patient better. Plus, there are bleeding
and other complications associated with Plavix and aspirin. It's
estimated about 5%. Hospitalization, transfusions, not to mention
poorer patient
outcomes. Eliminating those -- that's also better. Finally,
patients who get stents also often need other surgeries: dental surgery,
knee replacements, biopsies, etc. and many of these procedures are
difficult or impossible to do when the patient is on Plavix and aspirin.
Reducing the DAPT period to three months reduces this problem as
well.
For more on the OPTIMIZE Trial, read my
interview with Dr. Fausto Feres
of Instituto Dante Pazzanese de
Cardiologia in São Paulo, Brazil.
|
|
|