|
|
|
April
22,
2011 -- 7:10pm EDT
Showdown: Dr. Mark Midei and Stents
Maryland
interventional cardiologist Dr. Mark G. Midei, who has been under investigation
for "implanting unnecessary
stents" in heart patients, has penned a defense of his medical practice,
his first comment on the subject since the charges were made. Appearing
as a Commentary in tomorrow's Baltimore
Sun,
Midei's article is titled
"I
acted in the patients' best interests".
I've covered this particular issue previously ("Stent
Accusations: The U.S. Senate Tries to Drum Up COURAGE"). In that
article, Angioplasty pioneer, Dr. William O'Neill, who was hired by
Midei's lawyer to review the cases...and found nothing glaringly wrong...posed
a question
to me, expressing his concern over the situation:
"...this is the kind of media circus
that destroys the lives and
reputations of innocent people. And we have this culture now
of "guilty until proven innocent." Both of the articles
in the New York Times and in the Wall Street Journal just
started all of this with the assumption that Midei has been
guilty
of something.... And the initial premise is incorrect.
"So when do we correct the record for
this guy when all is said and done? He's going to be exonerated
at his trial. He
hasn’t been convicted of any crime and there haven’t
been any medical sanctions brought against him, so for God's
sake, give the guy the presumption of innocence until something
is actually proven that he did wrong." |
We will soon see if Dr. Midei's career gets reborn (you
know, it's Spring, Easter weekend, bulbs and buds, etc. etc.) --
his licensure hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, April 27, before the
Maryland Board of Physicians.
In an interesting side-note, part of the response to
these issues was that the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography
and Interventions (SCAI) and the Maryland Chapter of ACC had pushed
for a bill in the Maryland legislature that would set up a study
group for accrediting cath labs and providing uniform protocols for
decision-making about stents.
Makes sense.
But according to Reed
Miller's report in theheart.org, that bill was nixed last week, due to the
lobbying efforts of unnamed
special-interest groups. To clarify: the ACC and SCAI represent
cardiologists -- in other words the doctors' groups wanted to set
up a system of
oversight and they met resistance...from...???
Also, a shout out to Larry Husten who brought Dr. Midei's
commentary to my attention on his blog Cardiobrief.
|
|
|