Is This Angiogram / Angioplasty Necessary?

If you've been told you need an angiogram and maybe an angioplasty or stent, post your comments here

Current Postings (6):

• Tom -- sorry you're confused -- hopefully it's not because of our articles, but because there has been much confusion around the results of the COURAGE trial. OK. Number one. A blockage does not necessarily mean you're at risk for a heart attack. It is currently believed that heart attacks are caused by "vulnerable plaque", a coronary artery plaque that ruptures releasing all kinds of thrombus-inducing material into the blood stream, causing clots, and subsequent blockage of blood flow. These plaques are not necessarily large ones that would be seen on angiography. However, they CAN be seen using other techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The question on whether opening up any blockage is always, "Is it obstructive?" That is, does it reduce blood flow to the point that (1) it causes angina; or (2) it is so narrow, and in a major artery, that any small clot could cause a major event. To answer your question, all these trials and studies try to point to what could be called "best practice". What the COURAGE trial DID show was that stenting could be safely deferred in the patient population covered by the COURAGE trial -- namely low risk patients with stable angina. Other types of patients, such as the scenario you describe, cannot be automatically included.
Angioplasty.Org Staff, Angioplasty.Org, April 23, 2007

• After reading Angioplasty.Org's articles commenting on the "COURAGE" TRIAL", I am little confused. What about this scenario: An individual is currently experiencing NO angina or other symptoms, but since routine tests are questionable, a subsequent angiogram reveals previous double-bypass done four years ago has failed (closed), and patient is back where he started from with 80% blockages involving the distal left main & the ostium of the left circumflex artery & the left anterior descending artery (but, as I said, with No current angina). Are we to conclude that since this time there is no angina or other symptoms, that rather then using stents or attempting another bypass that the patient should initially treat this with medications only? And if so, is not the patient risking a sudden massive heart attack during this treatment, since blockages in those areas are rather serious?
Tom T., Arizona, USA, April 23, 2007

• Jay -- read the articles listed in the right-column side-bar. They talk about the COURAGE trial which showed that angioplasty and/or stenting did not prolong life or prevent heart attacks in patients with stable angina and relatively low risk blockages. Stents did, however, reduce angina (chest pain) and improve exercise tolerance better than drugs alone -- which is really why angioplasty is used. There has never been a study demonstrating that stents or angioplasty prolong life or prevent heart attacks better than drugs. We recommend that you inform yourself and then discuss these issues with your cardiologist. Many have warned against the oculo-stenotic reflex -- where cardiologists do diagnostic catheterizations and, if they see a blockage (a.k.a. stenosis), they unblock it in the same session. There are plusses and minues to this approach, also called "ad hoc angioplasty". The plusses? The patient doesn't need to undergo a second catheterization. The complication rate for catheterization is somewhere between 3-6%, mostly around the femoral artery entry point. So by doing everything in the same session you minimize the complications. Also the cost is reduced. The minuses? You eliminate a less invasive option, which is trying medical therapy to alleviate the symptoms and going back with a stent only if that doesn't work. All of this is a complicated issue. Our advice is to discuss these concerns with your interventional cardiologist BEFORE getting into the cath lab -- decide together what the best course of action is, and then proceed in confidence and understanding that you are doing the right thing. You might also ask whether a 64 slice CT scan might be a less invasive diagnostic first step. Again, your cardiologist may have very specific and very good reasons for stenting. And there's no problem asking what they are.
Angioplasty.Org Staff, Angioplasty.Org, April 23, 2007

• Thank you for your web-site and its wealth of information. I am 49 y/o man, active with no symptoms of heart disease. I have mild hypertension and a family history of heart disease. Last week I had a stress test at my first-ever visit to a cardiologist. They suggested angiogram immediately, and informed me if they found blockages, they would treat then-and-there with angioplasty and stents. I am concerned about doing too much too quickly. Are there alternative treatments to using stents?
Jay B., Arizona, USA, April 23, 2007

VL -- 70% blockage is what the very provocative COURAGE trial just looked at, and found that in low risk patients with stable angina, there was no difference in survival or incidence of heart attack between those who had optimal medical therapy or those who also had a stent placed. The take-away from the study was that for those patients, there was no "emergency" to have a stent placed. Of course, you need to discuss with your cardiologist if you are part of the patient population studied in the COURAGE trial -- or at higher risk.
Angioplasty.Org Staff, Angioplasty.Org, April 12, 2007

• I have a 70% blockage of right anterior artery, diagnosed by angioplasty, 65% EF, just became 78yrs, female. Dr. says I must have stent or heart attack. Scheduled for Apr. 19, but wonder why there is such a hurry. I have a cat scan coming up in June to check for metastasis and am concerned about being on plavix if surgery is needed. I am asymptomatic and would like to delay stenting. Am I being unrealistic?
VL, Florida, USA, April 7, 2007

The Cardiology Patient Forum needs your help...
Donate Now!

related topics
Answers to Top Ten Questions About Stents and Angioplasty vs. Drug Therapy

• Don't Cancel Your Angioplasty or Heart Stent Yet, Say Patient Advocates

Click here for more information about these


add your response
Please keep your posting concise. For readability we limit responses to 1,200 characters. Also note that The Forum is not an "ask-a-doctor" service; we do not dispense medical
advice about a patient's specific situation. Read our disclaimer and note that no information
on this Forum should be viewed as a substitute for medical advice or as a consultation
with a medical doctor
: characters left

Forum name -- how do you want to be identified on your post (Required) your email address (Required):
email address must be current and valid; if email sent to the address
below is returned, your comments will not be posted; your email address
will not be displayed on the Forum unless you specifically request it: please enter your email address again (for verification)
geographic location (city, state, province and/or country -- Required):
REQUIRED -- Check the box below to let us know you are a "real human being" and not a spambot. You must check this box for your posting to be submitted: I am a real person and not a spambot The following information is optional. your name:

your organization:
Check the box below if you wish Angioplasty.Org to "anonymize" your posting (for example, John Doe, Baltimore, Maryland, USA would become John D., Maryland, USA): please anonymize me To submit your post, please click the button below once and wait for a confirmation.
Clicking more than once will result in multiple submissions.

Please note the following disclaimer: The information contained in this web site is accurate to the best of the knowledge of Angioplasty.Org. None of this information should be viewed as a substitute for medical advice or as a consultation with a medical doctor. It is highly recommended that readers discuss any advice with a medical doctor before deciding on a course of action. Angioplasty.Org or its producers assume no liability for any actions taken as a result of information contained on this site, whether implied or expressed. Opinions and recommendations expressed on the FORUM are solely those of their authors. All submissions are reviewed and posted at the editors' discretion. FORUM submissions that are primarily commercial in nature, advertising services or products, are not posted. Any medical advice expressed on the FORUM does not necessarily represent the views of Angioplasty.Org, its producers, or of anyone associated with it, or of others appearing on this web site. Please note that this is a moderated discussion, so your response will appear after a short review.

Angioplasty.Org Home   PatientCenter

send comments & suggestions to "info at angioplasty dot org"
Read our Privacy statement.

The Cardiology Patients' Forum
receives sole support from
reader contributions and sponsored search engine ads

Angioplasty.Org is an editorially independent informational health site
which has received unrestricted educational grants from
Medtronic plc, TCROSS NEWS, Toshiba America Medical Systems, Volcano Corporation, Terumo Medical Corporation
Cardium Therapeutics, Inc. and Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of NY

For more information, see About Us
All content, including text, photos and video
©Copyright Venture Digital LLC 1996-2021