The Voice in the Ear -- Burt's Blog
<< To Homepage >>
<<Archives>>

November 2004 Archives


November 29, 2004

A Tale of Two Cities
I confess. I've spent the past two weeks blog-less, as I traversed the U.S. of A. by automobile during one of them. And one night, as the white line fever got to me, I flashed on the fact that I write about how the circulatory system is, in fact, the highway of the body, and how it is now utilized by interventionalists to deliver therapy, drugs, and so on, to hearts, necks, kidneys, and so on. And here I was, on I-80, with trucks zapping past me left and right, delivering food to Fort Wayne and Fords to Cheyenne and livestock to Idaho. I'm on the highway of our national body and, coincidentally enough, traveling from New York to San Francisco, the two cities in which the first U.S. coronary angioplasties were done 26 years ago.

If you research "who did the first one", you'll find duplicate claims: Lenox Hill Hospital in New York (see last paragraph) claims the first; but so does St. Mary's Medical Center in San Francisco (see entry under 1978). The fact is that Simon Stertzer at Lenox Hill and Richard Myler in San Francisco both performed their first cath lab angioplasties on the same day in March 1978.

Myler had actually done several somewhat experimental angioplasties with Andreas Gruentzig in San Francisco the previous year, but they were done during bypass operations, to see if the technology worked. Both Myler and Stertzer had learned the procedure from Gruentzig, a German angiologist living in Zurich, and they knew each other and communicated regularly. (The photo shows, clockwise from the left, Gruentzig, Stertzer and Myler.) Gruentzig did the first PTCA in Switzerland in September 1977. Somehow six months later, both Stertzer and Myler found suitable patients to do on the same day. They did not, they've told me, coordinate the events. And there has been the thought that they weren't done exactly on the same day. Nevertheless, Myler subsequently invited Stertzer to come to San Francisco ("flowers in the hair" not necessary -- this was the 80's). He did (I did, too) and they joined forces to teach a whole generation of cardiologists how to do angioplasty.

And me, I'm just looking for "the next Best Western"....


November 15, 2004

What Flavor Stent Would You Like?
Got a survey form submitted today in which the patient answered the question "Is there information that you wish you had been given before your angioplasty?" He answered, I wish I knew the "...type of stents that were available, and the pros & cons of each."

Anecdotal, but indicative of what I've been hearing from many doctors. More and more patients want to know exactly what's being put into their bodies and why, and have a say in the decision. As Michael L. Marin, MD, interim chair of vascular surgery at Mt. Sinai in NYC, told me:

"...patients are sharper, know more. The Internet has had a huge impact on their level of knowledge about vascular disease and potential treatments. And they come in asking for, and in some cases even demanding, certain forms of therapy."


November 10, 2004

Are You Experienced?
Picked up the current issue of U.S. News & World Report to read the cover feature, "How To Be A Smart Patient" and it's a good issue -- I was specifically interested in the article, "Don't Get Buried" -- cute title, guys! -- it discusses how to get reliable health information and echoes many of the concerns I've written about here and on our site at Angioplasty.Org. But I was struck by the final paragraph which talks about checking out hospital rankings, etc. (U.S. News, of course, ranks 'America's Best Hospitals' -- along with 'America's Best Colleges'). The author suggests getting procedures, stents in particular, from physicians who are experienced -- we agree that this is a good idea. But then the article claims that in New York State during 2002:

"...almost 20 percent of hospitals that inserted heart stents did six or fewer of them, and more than 40 percent of physicians who inserted a stent did it one time."

Almost half of the cardiologists in NY did only one stent the entire year?? This did not sound right to me. As I've written, the AHA/ACC guidelines recommend that operators do a minimum of 75 procedures annually. So This was a very odd statistic -- New York is not exactly a rural state!

So I checked out the source of the article's data at the Center for Medical Consumers. There were the numbers, aggregated from New York State government sources. But it still didn't seem right to me, so I plumbed the depths and listed out physicians by name, and then saw that high volume operators I know, like Gregg Stone and Gary Roubin, both in New York City, were credited with less than 200 cases. According to the State data, Gary Roubin of Lenox Hill Hospital did only 126 stents in 2002 . Yeah! Maybe with his eyes closed. I've worked with Gary on live demonstration courses, and he is fast! We'd barely have our cameras focused and he'd already be done. The fact is, most of these high volume docs do 3 or 4 or more a day -- so the NYS data can't be accurate. Furthermore, I checked out a few of the "one-time" guys and found that many aren't even interventional cardiologists. My guess is they were Fellows or residents who signed off on the case records as part of their clerical duties, and thus their physicians' license numbers were entered into the database; thus they were credited with "doing" the case. So methinks the hospitals of New York are a bit more experienced than the official State data shows.

Having statewide reporting is a great idea, but not if it's inaccurate. Proud of my investigative prowess, I quote the subtitle of the U.S. News article, "You can find what you need -- if you stay focused".


November 7, 2004

More About Emergency Angioplasty
Here's a quick reinforcing footnote to my previous criticism of HeartCenterOnline's somewhat misleading report about higher mortality rates from angioplasty in hospitals without surgical backup. On the opening day of the American Heart Association's annual session, and as reported in theheart.org, well-known cardiologist, Dr. Cindy Grines,

"...argued against the idea that primary PCI should be performed only by high-volume operators at centers where surgical back-up was available. 'Even at centers without surgical back-up, patients still do better if they have primary PCI,' she said."

Having a heart attack? Tell the ambulance to take you to a hospital that performs angioplasty!


November 5, 2004

We All Need Somebody to Lean On
A few years back I was meeting with a very highly regarded interventional cardiologist when his secretary interrupted us -- seems the daughter of a patient he'd done an angioplasty on was calling to see if he could recommend any support groups her father could join to help him with lifestyle changes post-procedure. The cardiologist snapped back, "Support group? Lifestyle? If going through what he's gone through hasn't changed him, I can't tell him anything!"

I cringed and hoped that this exceptional cardiologist was indeed the exception -- of course, we all know that the idea of post-procedure support is extremely important. But sometimes I wonder. At Angioplasty.Org, we get emails from patients all over the world, asking our advice on what they should do now that they have been ballooned and/or stented -- how much and often can they run, lift, have sex? We've got information on our site about post-procedural care, and I usually write back telling patients that I'm not a doctor, I just play one on the internet -- and I tell them they really need to ask their physician these questions because every patient's situation is different and post-procedure recommendations must be tailored for the individual. But I'm always amazed that a person can go through an expensive and serious procedure like an angioplasty and walk out of the hospital with a brief "Now watch what you eat!" and "Try to stop smoking!" and "Good luck!".

Not long ago, I stood at a patient's bedside. The patient was about to have a stent implanted -- her second. During the pre-angioplasty prep session, the nurse asked the patient if she'd stopped smoking. "Oh sure", the patient replied. "For how long?", the nurse continued. The patient restated that she wasn't smoking now -- she's in the hospital! The nurse smiled and persisted, "I know you're not smoking now, but when did you have your last cigarette?" "Yesterday," the patient meekly confessed.

Changing one's ways is not easy. But what's clear is that patients need re-training, not just a short lecture. More and more hospitals are helping in this area -- the good cardiology practices involve their patients in follow-up. But more needs to be done. Coronary artery disease -- or more accurately, atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries, because the same disease also occurs in the kidney, leg and neck arteries (I'll talk more about this in another post) -- is a chronic disease. While angioplasties and stents can provide an immediate mechanical fix, the disease is biologic and patients can do a lot to reduce the risk factors of recurrence. Disease management (see our free workshop offer from Stanford's Patient Education Center) is crucial to patients' recovery -- so I hope when patients walk out the hospital door, they walk out with the "support" they need and deserve.


November 2, 2004

So Much for Breaking News
An addition to my reviews of heart health sites -- yesterday in my mailbox was a newsletter from HeartCenterOnline, with a link to their breaking news article, "Heart procedures at non-cardiac hospitals are questioned". They're reporting on a study from the Journal of the American Medical Association. The HeartCenterOnline article claims that the study shows higher mortality rates in hospitals that do not have surgical (open heart) teams on site. So is the AMA saying "don't have an angioplasty at a non-cardiac-surgery hospital"? Not at all, as it turns out!

The HeartCenterOnline coverage fails to mention two crucial facts from the JAMA study: (1) for emergency angioplasty patients (those in the midst of having a heart attack and being treated with balloons/stents) there was no difference in mortality; and (2) where hospitals practiced greater than 50 cases/year, there was virtually no difference in mortality among all patients.

So here's the thing: it's well known that practice makes perfect. The AHA/ACC Guidelines for performing angioplasty state that cardiologists should perform at least 75 procedures a year. Less than that (and for hospitals that perform a total of < 200 a year) should only be done "in a region that is underserved because of geography". That's why hospitals without surgical backup started performing emergency angioplasties in the first place! To save the lives of victims in geographically underserved areas where an open heart surgical team might not exist. And save lives they do!

The JAMA study expresses concern, and rightly so, that these smaller low volume hospitals are expanding angioplasty beyond this emergency application. But the misreporting in HeartCenterOnline does a disservice to heart-attack victims and to the growing movement of local hospitals that are trying to provide life-saving emergency angioplasty. Sure, if you have time, go somewhere where they do angioplasty a lot! But if you're having a heart attack, you may not be able to "go the distance" to a big center. The important thing is to get as quickly as possible to any hospital that performs emergency angioplasty!