November 2004 Archives
November 29, 2004
A Tale of Two Cities
I confess. I've spent the past two weeks
blog-less, as I traversed the U.S. of A. by automobile during
one of them. And one night, as the white line fever got to
me, I flashed on the fact that I write about how the circulatory
system is, in fact, the highway of the body, and how it is
now utilized by interventionalists to deliver therapy, drugs,
and so on, to hearts, necks, kidneys, and so on. And here I
was, on I-80, with trucks zapping past me left and right, delivering
food to Fort Wayne and Fords to Cheyenne and livestock to Idaho.
I'm on the highway of our national body and, coincidentally
enough, traveling from New York to San Francisco, the two cities
in which the first U.S. coronary angioplasties were done 26
years ago.
If you research "who did the first one",
you'll find duplicate claims: Lenox
Hill Hospital in New York (see last paragraph) claims the
first; but so does St.
Mary's Medical Center in San Francisco (see entry under 1978).
The fact is that Simon Stertzer at Lenox Hill and Richard
Myler in San Francisco both performed their first cath lab angioplasties
on the same day in March 1978.
Myler
had actually done several somewhat experimental angioplasties
with Andreas Gruentzig in San Francisco the previous year, but
they were done during bypass operations, to see if the technology
worked. Both Myler and Stertzer had learned the procedure from
Gruentzig, a German angiologist living in Zurich, and they knew
each other and communicated regularly. (The photo shows, clockwise
from the left, Gruentzig, Stertzer and Myler.) Gruentzig did
the first PTCA in Switzerland in September 1977. Somehow six
months later, both Stertzer and Myler found suitable patients
to do on the same day. They did not, they've told me, coordinate
the events. And there has been the thought that they weren't
done exactly on the same day. Nevertheless, Myler subsequently
invited Stertzer to come to San Francisco ("flowers in the
hair" not necessary -- this was the 80's). He did (I did,
too) and they joined forces to teach a whole generation of cardiologists
how to do angioplasty.
And me, I'm just looking for "the
next Best Western"....
November 15, 2004
What Flavor Stent Would You Like?
Got a survey
form submitted today in which the patient answered the
question "Is there information that you wish you had
been given before your angioplasty?" He answered,
I wish I knew the "...type of stents that were available,
and the pros & cons of each."
Anecdotal, but indicative of what I've been
hearing from many doctors. More and more patients want to know
exactly what's being put into their bodies and why, and have
a say in the decision. As Michael L. Marin, MD, interim chair
of vascular surgery at Mt. Sinai in NYC, told me:
"...patients are sharper, know more.
The Internet has had a huge impact on their level of knowledge
about vascular disease and potential treatments. And they come
in asking for, and in some cases even demanding, certain forms
of therapy."
November 10, 2004
Are You Experienced?
Picked up the current issue of U.S.
News & World Report to read the cover feature, "How
To Be A Smart Patient" and it's a good issue -- I
was specifically interested in the article, "Don't
Get Buried" -- cute title, guys! -- it discusses how
to get reliable health information and echoes many of the concerns
I've written about here and on our site at Angioplasty.Org.
But I was struck by the final paragraph which talks about checking
out hospital rankings, etc. (U.S. News, of course, ranks 'America's
Best Hospitals' -- along with 'America's Best Colleges').
The author suggests getting procedures, stents in particular,
from physicians who are experienced -- we agree that this is
a good idea. But then the article claims that in New York State
during 2002:
"...almost 20 percent of hospitals that
inserted heart stents did six or fewer of them, and more than
40 percent of physicians who inserted a stent did it one time."
Almost half of the cardiologists in NY did
only one stent the entire year?? This did not sound
right to me. As I've written, the AHA/ACC guidelines recommend
that operators do a minimum of 75 procedures annually. So This
was a very odd statistic -- New York is not exactly a rural state!
So I checked out the source of the article's
data at the Center
for Medical Consumers. There were the numbers, aggregated
from New York State government sources. But it still didn't seem
right to me, so I plumbed the depths and listed out physicians
by name, and then saw that high volume operators I know, like Gregg
Stone and Gary Roubin, both in New York City, were credited
with less than 200 cases. According to the State data, Gary Roubin
of Lenox Hill Hospital did only 126 stents in 2002 . Yeah! Maybe
with his eyes closed. I've worked with Gary on live demonstration
courses, and he is fast! We'd barely have our cameras focused
and he'd already be done. The fact is, most of these high volume
docs do 3 or 4 or more a day -- so the NYS data can't be
accurate. Furthermore, I checked out a few of the "one-time" guys
and found that many aren't even interventional cardiologists.
My guess is they were Fellows or residents who signed off on
the case records as part of their clerical duties, and thus their
physicians' license numbers were entered into the database; thus
they were credited with "doing" the case. So methinks
the hospitals of New York are a bit more experienced than the
official State data shows.
Having statewide reporting is a great idea,
but not if it's inaccurate. Proud of my investigative prowess,
I quote the subtitle of the U.S. News article, "You
can find what you need -- if you stay focused".
November 7, 2004
More About Emergency Angioplasty
Here's a quick reinforcing footnote
to my previous criticism of HeartCenterOnline's
somewhat misleading report about
higher mortality rates from angioplasty in hospitals without
surgical backup. On the opening day of the American Heart Association's
annual session, and as reported in theheart.org,
well-known cardiologist, Dr. Cindy Grines,
"...argued against the idea that primary
PCI should be performed only by high-volume operators at centers
where surgical back-up was available. 'Even at centers without
surgical back-up, patients still do better if they have primary
PCI,' she said."
Having a heart attack? Tell the ambulance to
take you to a hospital that performs angioplasty!
November 5, 2004
We All Need Somebody to Lean On
A few years back I was meeting with
a very highly regarded interventional cardiologist when his
secretary interrupted us -- seems the daughter of a patient
he'd done an angioplasty on was calling to see if he could
recommend any support groups her father could join to help
him with lifestyle changes post-procedure. The cardiologist
snapped back, "Support group? Lifestyle? If going through
what he's gone through hasn't changed him, I can't tell him
anything!"
I cringed and hoped that this exceptional cardiologist
was indeed the exception -- of course, we all know that the idea
of post-procedure support is extremely important. But sometimes
I wonder. At Angioplasty.Org, we get emails from patients all
over the world, asking our advice on what they should do now
that they have been ballooned and/or stented -- how much and
often can they run, lift, have sex? We've got information on
our site about post-procedural care, and I usually write back
telling patients that I'm not a doctor, I just play one on the
internet -- and I tell them they really need to ask their physician
these questions because every patient's situation is different
and post-procedure recommendations must be tailored for the individual.
But I'm always amazed that a person can go through an expensive
and serious procedure like an angioplasty and walk out of the
hospital with a brief "Now watch what you eat!" and "Try
to stop smoking!" and "Good luck!".
Not long ago, I stood at a patient's bedside.
The patient was about to have a stent implanted -- her second.
During the pre-angioplasty prep session, the nurse asked the
patient if she'd stopped smoking. "Oh sure", the patient
replied. "For how long?", the nurse continued. The
patient restated that she wasn't smoking now -- she's in the
hospital! The nurse smiled and persisted, "I know you're
not smoking now, but when did you have your last cigarette?" "Yesterday," the
patient meekly confessed.
Changing one's ways is not easy. But what's
clear is that patients need re-training, not just a
short lecture. More and more hospitals are helping in this area
-- the good cardiology practices involve their patients in follow-up.
But more needs to be done. Coronary artery disease -- or more
accurately, atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries, because
the same disease also occurs in the kidney, leg and neck arteries
(I'll talk more about this in another post) -- is a chronic disease.
While angioplasties and stents can provide an immediate mechanical
fix, the disease is biologic and patients can do a lot to reduce
the risk factors of recurrence. Disease management (see
our free workshop offer from Stanford's Patient Education Center)
is crucial to patients' recovery -- so I hope when patients walk
out the hospital door, they walk out with the "support" they
need and deserve.
November 2, 2004
So Much for Breaking News
An addition to my
reviews of heart health sites -- yesterday in my mailbox
was a newsletter from HeartCenterOnline, with a link to their
breaking news article, "Heart
procedures at non-cardiac hospitals are questioned".
They're reporting on a study from the Journal
of the American Medical Association. The HeartCenterOnline
article claims that the study shows higher mortality rates
in hospitals that do not have surgical (open heart) teams on
site. So is the AMA saying "don't have an angioplasty
at a non-cardiac-surgery hospital"? Not at all, as it
turns out!
The HeartCenterOnline coverage fails to
mention two crucial facts from the JAMA study: (1) for
emergency angioplasty patients (those in the midst of having
a heart attack and being treated with balloons/stents) there
was no difference in mortality; and (2) where
hospitals practiced greater than 50 cases/year, there was virtually no
difference in mortality among all patients.
So here's the thing: it's well known that practice
makes perfect. The AHA/ACC
Guidelines for performing angioplasty state that cardiologists
should perform at least 75 procedures a year. Less than that
(and for hospitals that perform a total of < 200 a year) should
only be done "in a region that is underserved because
of geography". That's why hospitals without surgical
backup started performing emergency angioplasties in the first
place! To save the lives of victims in geographically underserved
areas where an open heart surgical team might not exist. And
save lives they do!
The JAMA study expresses concern, and rightly
so, that these smaller low volume hospitals are expanding angioplasty
beyond this emergency application. But the misreporting in HeartCenterOnline
does a disservice to heart-attack victims and to the growing
movement of local hospitals that are trying to provide life-saving
emergency angioplasty. Sure, if you have time, go somewhere where
they do angioplasty a lot! But if you're having a heart attack,
you may not be able to "go the distance" to a big center.
The important thing is to get as quickly as possible to any hospital
that performs emergency
angioplasty!
|