Angioplasty.Org Home




Editor's Blog



Imaging and Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease











About Us
Donate Now to Angioplasty.Org

    

Drug Eluting Stent News
News and Information About Minimally Invasive Medicine
Angioplasty.Org HomePatientCenterBlogDiscussion Forum
Home » StentCenter » Stent News » February 10, 2010

Drug-Eluting Stents Safe and Effective for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis
Clinical Benefit Seen at Nine Months is Maintained at Four Years

related stories:
Drug-Eluting Stent Center

In-Stent Restenosis
Patient Forum


Sirolimus-eluting stent
Sirolimus-eluting stent
    February 10, 2010 -- From Arezzo, Italy come long-term large registry data demonstrating the successful use of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of re-occluded bare metal stents. In the current issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Dr. Francesco Liistro and his colleagues at the Ospedale San Donato report that after four years, the clinical benefit seen at nine months has held steady with a need to reopen the artery only 11% of the time.

First Attempts to Treat In-Stent Restenosis
The proper treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been a challenge ever since the beginning of the stent era in the 1990's. Bare metal stents improved upon the angioplasty procedure in many situations, but the problem of restenosis (re-blockage of the artery) while lessened, still was seen around 20-25% of the time.

Potential fixes for patients coming back to the cath lab were tried, first with balloon angioplasty, where a balloon was inserted and inflated inside the blocked stent. Result were mixed. A more sophisticated (and expensive) approach was developed using radiation in a procedure called brachytherapy. It was thought that irradiating the tissue would suppress re-growth inside the stent. Results were also mixed and the promise of this technology disappeared as the manufacturers of the equipment discontinued production.

With the development of the drug-eluting stent (DES), a new kind of stent that emitted a drug to suppress tissue re-growth, cardiologists began placing a stent within a stent, and the results were encouraging. But until now, the data around safety and effectiveness have only reached periods of a year or less.

Results of the TRUE Registry: Effectiveness and Safety
The TRUE (Tuscany Registry of Sirolimus for Unselected In-Stent Restenosis) registry followed 224 patients who were treated for ISR at two centers in Italy. The concept was to get a "real world" scenario: the patients were consecutive, "all-comers", and no exclusion criteria due to clinical status were imposed. So complex cases were included in the registry: bifurcation lesions, diabetics, etc. Patients were given dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel or ticlopidine) for at least 6 months following the procedure.

At one year, the treatment was 95% successful: only 5 patients out of 100 needed to have another procedure to re-open the artery (and all but one had this done in the cath lab). After four years, only another 6% had re-blockages occur, making for a total restenosis rate after four years of 11%.

The safety of drug-eluting stents has been an issue since the initial concerns about late stent thrombosis surfaced back in 2006. It was thought that something about these devices caused blood to clot inside the stent more frequently. The percentage of increase was small, but the results of a stent thrombosis can be devastating, causing death or heart attack half of the time. With the situation of a stent-within-a-stent, the concern was even higher, one reason why the treatment of ISR with a drug-eluting stent is an "off label" indication. However, only 7 patients had a stent thrombosis after four years (5 definite / 2 possible) for a stent thrombosis rate of 2.8%.

At the end of the four years, one in ten patients had died, although less than half were from a cardiac-related cause. 80% of the patients remained free from any major adverse cardiac event.

These results are similar to those from other ISR studies, albeit none tracked patients for this long. This study only used sirolimus-eluting stents (e.g. CYPHER). Whether or not other types of drug-eluting stents would have similar results cannot be extrapolated from this data.

Reported by Burt Cohen, February 10, 2010


(Disclaimer: external links to news, press releases and other timely information sources are provided as a service by Angioplasty.Org, which is not responsible for the content found on any external sites. Items marked with a ($$) indicate that the external site normally restricts viewing to paid subscribers. Other sites may require free registration.

Angioplasty.Org Home •  PatientCenter


send comments & suggestions to "info at angioplasty dot org"
read Terms of Use and Privacy statement

Angioplasty.Org is an independent educational health site
The StentCenter on Angioplasty.Org is supported by
Medtronic, Inc.
Unless otherwise noted, all content, including text, photos and video
© Copyright Venture Digital LLC 1996-2010