The following
archived links to news, company press releases
and other information sources are provided as a
service by the Angioplasty.Org, which is not responsible
for the content found on these external sites.
If you wish a different date
range, select a news archive, or our special Drug-Eluting
Stent NewsCenter, from the following menu:
December
29, 2005 Drug-Eluting
Stents May Cause Allergic Reactions
A new study appearing in next week's Journal of the American College
of Cardiology reports on a phenomenon that is not news to us here at
Angioplasty.Org: allergic reactions to drug-eluting stents. Our Forum
Topic has received almost 90 postings from patients on the subject,
most in the past two years since the introduction of drug-eluting stents.
The Northwestern study used a number of sources for the adverse reactions,
among them the FDA MAUDE database. The study found definite allergic
reactions to the stents themselves -- possibly to the polymer coatings
on the stents. Symptoms included rash, difficulty breathing, hives, itching
and fevers. (Read
more...)
December 13,
2005 Guidant
Enrolls First Patient in Japan Arm of Drug Eluting Stent
Trial (source: Guidant Corporation)
The company announced today that it has now begun enrollment in the Japan
arm of its SPIRIT III drug eluting stent clinical trial evaluating XIENCE™ V,
an everolimus eluting coronary stent system utilizing Guidant's cobalt
chromium MULTI-LINK VISION® Coronary Stent System rapid exchange platform.
December 13,
2005 Medtronic
Announces First Clinical Trial Experience With Next-Generation
Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent System (source: Medtronic, Inc.)
This next-generation drug-eluting stent will use the popular Driver™ bare
metal cobalt alloy stent platform and the drug Zotarolimus (ABT-578),
licensed from Abbott, along with the proprietary, biocompatible drug
delivery polymer developed by Medtronic. Prof. Ian Meredith, Monash Medical
Centre, is the principal investigator of the Medtronic RESOLUTE clinical
study evaluating the new stent. This first-in-man study will enroll up
to 100 patients at 12 clinical sites in Australia and New Zealand. The
new polymer will allow more precise and adjustable rates of drug release. related stories: Medtronic
begins test of new stent -- Reuters
December 1,
2005 Italian
Ministry of Health Assigns Higher Price Premium to CYPHER® Sirolimus-Eluting
Coronary Stent (source: Cordis Corporation)
According to this company press release from Cordis / J&J, the Italian
government's Commissione Unica Dispositivi medica (CUD) – the National
Committee for Medical Devices -- has decided to pay more for the Cypher
drug-eluting stent -- a 23% higher price than other drug-eluting stents
on the market, due to lower costs associated with re-intervention. Brian
G. Firth, Cordis worldwide VP of medical affairs and health economics,
states, "CUD's analysis has shown that initial treatment costs combined
with minimal costs of follow-up and long-term care for patients with
the CYPHER® Stent offer a clear advantage over other commercially available
drug-eluting stents."
December 1,
2005 Conor
Medsystems Receives FDA Approval for Full Expansion of
COSTAR II Drug Eluting Stent Trial (source: Conor Medsystems, Inc.)
The company announced that it has received FDA approval to expand its
randomized clinical trial to a full cohort of 1,700 patients. The trial
will compare Conor's COSTAR II drug-eluting stent to Boston Scientific's
Taxus (patent lawsuit and countersuits have been filed). The results
should be more than interesting because Conor's stent uses the same drug
(paclitaxel) as the Taxus, but the drug delivery system differs. In the
Boston stent, a polymer which controls the release dose of the drug is
coated on the entire stent. The drug gets released in the first few months
and the inner lining of the artery covers the polymer-coated stent over
time. In the Conor stent, a bioresorbable polymer containing the drug
is loaded into hundreds of small holes or reservoirs in the stent's metal
surface. Once the polymer has released its drug over time, it is absorbed
into the body, leaving no residue, and the Conor COSTAR II stent, for
all intents, becomes a bare metal stent. There have been some concerns
(most recently expressed by Dr. Renu Virmani at this year's TCT) that
non-resorbable polymers on the two currently available drug-eluting stents
may delay healing of the artery and be a cause for late stent thrombosis
(clotting) which, while low in occurrence, is fatal almost half the time.
Her research showed no such effect in bare metal stents, so the results
of the CONOR trial will be closely watched. related stories: Conor
says FDA approves widened stent trial -- Reuters Suit
and Countersuit: Angiotech Trades Barbs with Conor Medsystems -- Medical
DeviceLink
November 29,
2005 SurModics'
Hydrophilic Coating on Medtronic Endeavor™ Drug-Eluting
Stent Delivery System (source: SurModics, Inc.)
Company announces that it has licensed its advanced hydrophilic technology
to Medtronic for use on their Endeavor drug-eluting stent delivery system
to make the catheter that carries the stent more "lubricious".
SurModics also makes the BRAVO™ polymer that is used on Cordis/J&J's
Cypher™ stent.
November 28,
2005 Drug-coated
stents equally effective (source: Karen Garloch, Charlotte Observer)
A report quoting Dr. Charles Simonton of the Sanger Clinic in Charlotte,
North Carolina, who headed up the 14,000 patient STENT
Registry, comparing the Taxus and Cypher stents. He states, "These
two stents are performing almost identically.... There's no reason why
an interventional cardiologist ought to pick one over the other based
on the way patients are turning out." related stories: Trends
Favour Boston Scientific's TAXUS Stent Over J&J's Cypher in Interim
9-Month Data From Largest Independent DES Registry in US -- Boston
Scientific The Company has a slightly different interpretation of the data
than the STENT registry's lead investigator. Déjà Lu: "already
read" -- Voice in the Ear: The Stent Blog Can you step into the same press release twice?
November 26,
2005 Boston
Scientific Says Its Stent Has An Edge Over J&J (source: Wall Street Journal $$)
Paul LaViolette, COO of Boston Scientific, tells the Wall Street Journal
that a study the company commissioned showed that its Taxus stent may
have a "considerable advantage" over the competing Cypher stent,
made by Johnson & Johnson. A review and analysis of FDA "adverse
report" records made by Certus International showed a significantly
larger number of reports of restenosis (renarrowing) or thrombosis (clotting)
with the Cypher stent. Terri Mueller of Cordis/Johnson & Johnson
called Boston Scientific's statement "inappropriate and misleading," while
Dennis Donohoe, Cordis' VP for regulatory affairs pointed out that the
FDA database was not meant to be used for these types of analyses, which
are better determined through clinical trials. The ongoing "Stent
Wars" between these two rivals have bred much controversy. Most
clinical trials have shown the two stents roughly equivalent in regard
to thrombosis and restenosis; some smaller single center trials have
shown that Cypher is better at preventing restenosis. related stories: My
Night With MAUDE -- The Voice in the Ear:
The Stent Blog Can the FDA adverse events database really be used to show
superiority of one device over another? Here's a hint: NO!
November 16,
2005 J&J-Guidant
merger to shake up stent market (source: Stephen Heuser, Boston Globe)
An analysis of the impact of J&J buying Guidant on Boston Scientific
and the stent market in general.
November 15,
2005 Boston
Scientific questions Michigan center's complaints (source: St. Paul Pioneer Press/Bloomberg News)
Boston Scientific said problems with
its heart stents at Michigan's busiest cardiac center haven't occurred
elsewhere and, according to this article, suggested that doctors may
have mishandled the devices. "It is essential to follow the directions
for use...It appears that some individuals at Beaumont are not satisfied,
but their dissatisfaction is out of all proportion to our experience
at more than 1,000 cardiac catheterization labs,"" said Boston
Scientific spokesman Paul Donovan.
November 15,
2005 Guidant
Reports Excellent 12-Month Results from SPIRIT FIRST Everolimus
Eluting Coronary Stent Clinical Trial (source: Guidant Corporation)
One year results from the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent were impressive,
says principal investigator Prof. Patrick W. Serruys, M.D. of Rotterdam.
He continues, "The benefit of an everolimus drug eluting stent, with
only one device-related MACE event and no thrombotic events, combined
with the highly deliverable rapid-exchange VISION stent and stent delivery
system, holds great promise for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular
disease." Results were presented at the AHA Scientific Sessions in Dallas.
November
14, 2005 Hospital's
Suspension of Boston Scientific Stent Gets FDA Review (source: Wall Street Journal $$)
According to an article in today's Wall Street Journal, the FDA is evaluating
the temporary suspension in the use of the Taxus stent enacted 7 weeks
ago by Dr. William O'Neill of William Beaumont Hospital in Michigan,
where over a 5-day period, three Taxus system balloons had difficulty
being withdrawn, and caused some injury to arterial linings. The problem
is different than the one which prompted a voluntary recall of the Taxus
stent in the summer of 2004, which had to do with a possible weak laser
weld in the catheter shaft. This new problem, if in fact it is one, seems
related to the balloon, not the stent. A stent is delivered to the artery
on a balloon which is inflated, thus expanding the stent into the desired
position; the balloon is then deflated and pulled out, leaving the stent
behind. Withdrawal of the balloon should be uneventful, which doesn't
seem to be the case here. There have been some perceptions of balloon "stickiness" since
soon after the Taxus stent was introduced although, according to a company
spokesperson, complaints are less than 1 in 10,000. Some physicians have
posited that the polymer coating of the stent can cause the balloon to
stick to the expanded stent and have difficulty deflating or withdrawing
after the stent has been delivered. Use of the stents was reinstated
by Dr. O'Neill after assurances from the company were made that there
were no defects in the product and Boston Scientific trainers visited
the hospital to work with the doctors. At issue is a complaint from Dr.
James Goldstein, a cardiologist at the hospital, that Boston Scientific
implied the issue has been "solved". His feeling is that the
problem has not been solved -- and now the FDA has stated that it "does
not consider this situation to be a 'closed' matter." Stay tuned. related stories: FDA
reviews Taxus complaints in Michigan -- Reuters
November 10,
2005 Guidant
Completes Enrollment in International Drug Eluting Stent
Clinical Trial (source: Guidant Corporation)
SPIRIT II is a 300-patient randomized clinical trial evaluating XIENCE™ V,
an everolimus eluting coronary stent system utilizing Guidant's cobalt
chromium rapid-exchange MULTI-LINK VISION® Coronary Stent System platform.
Prof. Patrick W. Serruys, M.D., of the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University
Hospital, Rotterdam, serves as the trial's principal investigator. "The
SPIRIT II trial will continue to evaluate the clinical experience of
XIENCE V, which demonstrated excellent six-month results in the SPIRIT
FIRST trial reported last fall," said Prof. Serruys. "We look forward
to the presentation of additional results from SPIRIT FIRST at the American
Heart Association Scientific Sessions next week."
October 27,
2005 Competing
medicated stents work equally well - Most comprehensive
USA clinical trial to date shows (source: Carolinas HealthCare System)
After completing the most comprehensive U.S.-based study of its kind,
Dr. Charles Simonton reported that the performance of two competing coronary
stents was “virtually identical” in head-to-head comparisons.
The STENT registry, which now includes approximately 14, 000 patients,
is the first of its kind to gather data from multiple sites, including
eight medical centers located throughout the Southeast. The registry
also includes one of the largest patient follow-up efforts based on a
profile of the general populace. related stories: TAXUS® Stent
Demonstrates Excellent Efficacy and Safety in Independent 'STENT' Registry -- Boston
Scientific Press release from the manufacturer of the Taxus stent claims
a "numeric trend" favors their stent. The
Numbers Game-- The Voice in the Ear Commentary on statistical claims and the marketing of stents
and how it affects patients.
October
22, 2005 Boston
Scientific Heads to the Recovery Room (source: Barron's Online)
An interesting overview of the rises and falls of Boston Scientific in
the drug-eluting stent era. When Boston's Taxus was introduced in
March 2004, it quickly captured two-thirds of the market. Then last summer's recalls,
along with studies presented
at the ACC in March which seemed to show Cypher superiority (even
though the major trial was in fact a draw) -- these events took their
toll and last Tuesday, J&J proudly reported that Cypher U.S. market
share had increased to 46%. Boston hopes to regain much of this lost
business with its new Liberte stent, hopefully to be approved later this
year or early 2006. But the company still seems to be on the defensive
-- Chief Financial Officer Larry Best complains in the article, "We've
got a growth story with Taxus, and no one wants to listen to it." And
later he says management would even entertain offers for the entire company. "We're
shareholders," he says, "and everything's for sale." Insiders,
a group to which Mr. Best would belong, own 35% of the company.
October
21, 2005 Some
Doctors See Long-Term Clot Risk In Stent Patients (source: Wall Street Journal -- $$)
We at Angioplasty.Org have been on this story for two
years now. Back in the fall of 2003, some late stent thrombosis that
appeared in Cypher patients caused alarm. The data were investigated
and it was concluded, correctly so, that the stent thrombosis rate of
less than 1% was comparable to that seen in bare metal stents. When Taxus
stents were introduced, most studies showed similar rates (notwithstanding
Johnson & Johnson / Cordis' campaign that attempted to imply that
Taxus was less safe). Then just this spring came a study
from Antonio Colombo's group that showed a real-world thrombosis
rate double that in the clinical studies. And now several reports
at the TCT are showing a small number of patients who have developed
thrombosis (clotting) at up to three years. Dr. Renu Virmani showed her
study of 40 drug-eluting stent patients who had died from cardiac causes
-- 60% of them had a blood clot in their drug-eluting stent. Of great
importance was the fact that all these patients also had bare metal stents
from earlier interventions: none of these stents showed clots. So the
late stent thrombosis problem seems to be a class effect for drug-eluting
stents, emphasizing that antiplatelet therapy is critical after the procedure
and more and more doctors now think should be extended well beyond the
recommended minimum 3-6 months. related stories: "Free" reprint
of above WSJ article -- Pittsburg Post-Gazette Doctors
study risk of clots in new stents -- Boston
Globe
October
21, 2005 Conor
Medsystems Presents Positive Clinical Data From EuroSTAR and
COSTAR I Studies (source: Conor Medsystems, Inc.)
The data from two studies have solidified Conor's decision to move forward
with a dose of 10mcg of the drug paclitaxel on its drug-eluting stent
the CoStar, which may see approval in Europe by the end of this year.
The results show restenosis rates similar to those of the two currently
U.S.-approved stents made by Boston Scientific and Cordis. The CoStar
embodies a different design which the company touts as being crfeated
specifically for drug delivery, rather than being an older bare metal
stent that has been retrofitted for that purpose. Several potential advantages
of the CoStar are ease-of-use, more deliverability, and the complete
absorption of the drug and its delivery medium by the body, leaving no
polymer behind after about 6 months -- this may have implications in
the growing concern over late stent thrombosis (blood clots that may
develop even 1 or 2 years after implantation of polymer-coated drug-eluting
stents -- this only has occurred in a small percetnage of patients, but
it is very serious) -- the CoStar has shown no stent thrombosis so far. related stories: Crashing
The Stent Party -- BusinessWeek Online Conor
Medsystems to Pursue Drug Stent -- Associated
Press
October
21, 2005 Sirolimus-Eluting
Coronary Stent Outperforms Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in Seven
Study Meta-Analysis (source: Cordis Corporation)
In this press release, a seven study "meta-analysis" shows
the Cypher stent outperforming the Taxus stent. While it is true that
virtually all studies have shown the Cypher sirolimus stent to be equal
to or slightly better than its Taxus paclitaxel rival in TLR (Total Lesion
Revascularization) one can also find that the two are equal, depending
on which definition of success one uses. For example, the TCTMD.com's "Evidence-Based
Medicine Center". using guidelines fashioned along those of
the European Society of Cardiology, finds that Taxus and Cypher are not
so different -- of course, the EBMC is "is made possible by support
from Boston Scientific Corporation".
October
20, 2005 TAXUS® Express2™ Stent
System Shows Significant Reduction of Restenosis in Diabetic
Patients in Clinical Trial (source: Boston Scientific Corporation) A subset of data from Boston Scientific's Taxus V
clinical trial showed marked reduction in restenosis
for diabetic patients, who are at increased risk for
having their arteries close up again after stenting.
At 9-months the Taxus stent group had a reclosure rate
of 9.6 percent compared with 17.5 percent in the control
group of bare metal stents -- a 45% reduction, interestingly
the same amount of reduction as in the non-diabetic population
-- the Taxus stent restenosis prevention effect seems
to work across the board.
October
20, 2005 Study
Finds Excellent Results in Patients with Long Lesions Treated
with Multiple and Overlapping CYPHER® Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (source: Cordis Corporation)
Dr. Campbell Rogers of Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston presented
a detailed analysis of data pooled across four drug-eluting stent clinical
trials at this year's TCT. The analysis finds that high risk patients
with long coronary blockages had better clinical outcomes with multiple,
overlapping or non overlapping, CYPHER® Stents than those patients who
received bare metal stents.
October
17, 2005 New
Study Results Suggest Better Outcomes With The CYPHER® Sirolimus-Eluting
Coronary Stent Than Brachytherapy In Patients With In-Stent Reblockage (source: Cordis Corporation)
Not that this is any surprise, since brachytherapy (radiation therapy)
is not really being used much anymore in interventional procedures. The
conundrum here is that brachytherapy is currently the ONLY FDA-approved
treatment for in-stent restenosis, yet it's been known that drug-eluting
stents work better -- cardiologists in fact sometimes use them "off-label" --
perhaps studies such as this will help the FDA expand the approved indications.
October
17, 2005 ENDEAVOR
III Confirmatory Study Demonstrates Clinical Outcomes Consistent
With Previous Endeavor Trials (source: Medtronic, Inc.)
The headline doesn't read this way, but the Endeavor III Trial, as some
had predicted, failed to meet its endpoint, albeit very narrowly, to
show non-inferiority with the Cypher stent. The real meaning of this
is that Medtronic's entry into the U.S. market may be delayed since the
FDA may want to see the results of Endeavor IV before granting approval.
(Endeavor IV pits the Medtronic stent against Boston's Taxus.) Medtronic
still feels that they will see approval in 2007; others in the device
industry have told Angioplasty.Org they think 2008 may be more realistic. related stories: Medtronic
stent study narrowly misses goal -- Reuters Medtronic
Stent Undershoots Target -- TheStreet.com
October 14,
2005 Boston
Scientific cuts outlook amid loss (source: Debra Sherman, Reuters)
Due to its $750 million settlement with Medinol and lower domestic sales
on their Taxus drug-eluting stent, Boston Scientific reported a loss
in its 3rd quarter. related stories: Boston's
Forecast Comes Up Short -- TheStreet.com
October
13, 2005 Boston
Scientific Wins Appeal in Patent Infringement Case Against Johnson & Johnson
in the Netherlands (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
Back in June, a Dutch court ruled
against Cordis on a patent infringement issue involving
not their stent, but the shaft of the catheter used to deliver the stent-on-a-balloon.
The court also issued an injunction against the sale by Cordis of products
using this patent (this included the Cypher). Cordis appealed the verdict
and in July, another court lifted the injunction temporarily while the
full apeal was being decided upon. Today the court ruled against J&J/Cordis
and the injunction is now back in full force. related stories: Boston
Scientific wins Dutch patent appeal over J&J -- Reuters
October 13,
2005 Boston
Scientific Announces 'TAXUS® Stent Assurance Program' (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
In a first-of-kind program, the company announced that it will replace
for free any Taxus stent that requires re-intervention in a patient.
The offer will run during calendar year 2006 and is good only to hospitals
that enroll in the program through their sales representatives. More
details can be found in this description on
Boston Scientific's website. (comment
on this story.) related stories: Stent
maker to offer free replacements -- Boston Globe Dr. Campbell Rogers, a cardiologist at Brigham and Women's
Hospital, said the guarantee was ''intriguing" but questioned
whether it would be practical for doctors and hospitals to reap the
benefits. The terms of the deal require hospitals to pre-enroll with
a Boston Scientific salesperson and submit multiple documents to
prove the artery has reclogged inside the stent. Boston
Scientific sees no Taxus share loss in quarter -- Reuters Paul LaViolette (COO of the company) states that there has
been no loss of market share to Johnson & Johnson's competing
Cypher stent in the 3rd quarter (this is contrary to some analysts'
predictions) and also that all problems stemming from last summer's
recall are fixed "definitively". The article has also been
recently updated to include commentary on Boston's "money-back
guarantee".
October
11, 2005 Medtronic
to present key drug-eluting stent data next week (source: Daniel Rosenberg, MarketWatch.com)
Good overview of the issues facing Medtronic next Monday when the data
from the Endeavor drug-eluting stent trials is presented at the TCT
meeting in Washington.
October 10,
2005 Never
a Dull Moment for Device Makers (source: Althea Chang, TheStreet.com)
An good wrap-up of where the various stent companies stand, as they approach "TCT-week",
starting next Sunday..
October 10,
2005 Johnson & Johnson
Outlook Boosted By Cypher (source: Forbes.com)
Several analysts expect Johnson & Johnson to announce strong gains
in market-share of drug-eluting stent, following Boston Scientific's
problems over the summer and clinical studies that have shown Cypher
edging out the Taxus in the most complex patients.
October
6, 2005 FTC
ruling key to Medtronic stent plans (source: Reuters)
While results from Medtronic's latest clinical trial for its Endeavor
drug-eluting stent will be presented at this year's TCT, a bigger question
for the company's future program will be an FTC ruling about whether
Johnson & Johnson will be required to license its rapid exchange
technology to other companies as part of its planned merger with Guidant.
If it is, J&J is expected to license the technology to Abbott, in
a bid to keep Medtronic from overtaking a share of its market (currently
shared with Boston Scientific). A rapid exchange system (which J&J,
Guidant and Boston all have) is considered critical to success in the
angioplasty market.
October
6, 2005 Guidant
Launches Cobalt Chromium Coronary Stent System in Japan (source: Guidant Corporation)
The rapid-exchange MULTI-LINK VISION® RX Stent System is made of
cobalt chromium, unlike the current generation of metal stents which
are made of stainless steel. Cobalt chromium is a stronger metal, thus
allowing a stent to be made with thinner struts -- exposing less stent
to the bloodstream and hopefully lowering the restenosis rate. Guidant
is using the VISION stent as the foundation for its own drug-eluting
stent program, the XIENCE™ V, currently in a clinical trial comparing
it to Boston Scientific's Taxus.
October 6,
2005 Cook
Launches Web Site for Patients Seeking Information About
Peripheral Arterial Disease (source: Cook Inc.)
The new website includes information about symptoms, prevention and treatment
of Periperal Arterial Disease (PAD). Consumers also can download information
to determine with their physicians whether they may be eligible to participate
in a worldwide clinical trial testing the safety and effectiveness of
the Zilver® PTX™ Drug-Eluting Stent. This is the first-ever
clinical trial to test a paclitaxel-eluting stent to treat PAD.
October
3, 2005 Drug-Coated
Stents Better for Diabetics
A study of 160 patients from Spain adds to the growing body of evidence
that diabetics, a patient population previously considered high risk
for reblocking after angioplasty/stenting, can be successfully treated
with drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents. Comparing bare metal stents to
a drug-eluting sirolimus stent (this would be the Cypher, made by Cordis/J&J)
the need for a repeat angioplasty was 5 times higher in the bare metal
group; the occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) was almost
4 times higher. A spokesman for the American Heart Association states
in the article that the study is "good news for patients with diabetes." (source: Ed Edelson, HealthDay)
September
26, 2005 Medinol
to seek royalties from Boston Scientific (source: MSNBC)
In the "not so fast" category, less than a week after announcing
a settlement (see
below) of its long-standing dispute with Medinol, Boston
Scientific finds itself again the target of legal action by the Israeli
firm, which is now claiming royalties due from the Taxus Liberte stent,
Boston Scientific's second-generation device, now approved in Europe.
While Boston Scientific feels the claims are without merit, J.P. Morgan
analyst Michael Weinstein states, "The issue for investors is that
the Boston Scientific press release made it seem like there was closure
to the Medinol issue, when clearly there is not.... What Medinol said
today is, no, there is not closure after October 25."
September 26,
2005 U.S.
FTC eyes licensing plan for J&J-Guidant deal (source: Reuters)
In a new wrinkle to the possible requirement that J&J/Guidant share
their "rapid exchange" technology to gain merger approval from
the Federal Trade Commission, recent reports are that they may be directed
to license the technology specifically to Abbott, leaving Medtronic and
other balloon and stent manufacturers out in the cold. Medtronic is not
pleased with this turn of events, and is taking its objections directly
to the four FTC commissioners.
September
23, 2005 Battle
of the Drug-Eluting Stents (source: Journal Watch Cardiology)
Commentary on the several studies published
in August comparing the sirolimus (Cypher) and paclitaxel (Taxus) drug-eluting
stents. Conclusion was that the sirolimus peformed somewhat better in
terms of less restenosis, but that "for many patients, the sirolimus
stent’s clinical advantages might be outweighed by the paclitaxel
stent’s greater ease of delivery and by cost differences." Also
with a new generation of stents coming along, these conclusion may need
revision.
September
21, 2005 Boston
Scientific and Medinol Announce Settlement (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
The long-standing legal dispute between Israeli-based Medinol and Boston
Scientific has been resolved -- and for the mere price of $750 million
dollars!! Briefly stated, Boston Scientific had an exclusive supply agreement
with Medinol for stents (a model no longer marketed -- the NIR stent)
but when difficulties arose between the two, Boston Scientific secretly
reverse-engineered the NIR and built an assembly line behind locked doors
in their Ireland plant. This information was communicated to Medinol
by Jim Tobin, CEO of Boston Scientific, who admitted it was wrong. However,
Boston claimed that Medinol has reneged on their agreement to supply
sufficient stents and that Boston took its action to protect its product
availability. Medinol also claimed that Boston Scientific infringed on
their stent patents in the design of the currently marketed Express and
Taxus Express stents. Kobi and Judith Richter, owners of Medinol, previously
rejected smaller settlement offers. While this agreement represents a
large cash outlay for Boston Scientific, it brings to a close a big unknown
that had the investment community concerned about whether a court might
order an injunction against sale of the Taxus stent, Boston Scientific's
big profit-center. Boston
Scientific settles with Medinol for $750 mln -- Reuters Boston
Scientific Settles Spat -- Wall Street Journal
($$)
September 19,
2005 J&J/Guidant
may license stent technology (source: Susan Kelly, Reuters)
J&J and Guidant may have to make their "rapid exchange" technologies
available to other companies for purchase in order to gain Federal regulators'
approval of their upcoming merger. Neither Medtronic nor Abbott, who
are looking at 2006-7 for introduction of their drug-eluting stents into
the U.S. market, currently have this technology and both are anxious
to get it. Boston Scientific has its own rapid exchange system (gained
when it acquired Schneider -- the first
manufacturer of angioplasty devices) and probably has the most to
lose from this licensing. In brief, rapid exchange is a two-handed system
which allows one operator (the cardiologist) to perform the entire angioplasty;
the original system requires four hands: two to hold the guiding catheter
and advance the balloon or stent and two more to hold and steer the guide
wire component, requiring the cardiologist and an assistant. Medtronic
May Seek to Buy Popular Stent Technology -- Wall
Street Journal ($$)
September
16, 2005 Medtronic
Completes Patient Enrollment In Endeavor III Clinical Trial (source: Medtronic Inc.)
The company has completed enrollment in its clinical trial, comparing
the performance of its Endeavor drug-eluting stent to that of the Cypher
sirolimus stent, made by Johnson & Johnson/Cordis. Results of this
trial will be presented at this October's TCT meeting in Washington.
September 1,
2005 Importance
of Antiplatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents (source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration)
A problem that Angioplasty.Org has been stressing for two
years now: the danger of premature withdrawal of antiplatelet
therapy (aspirin and/or Plavix). In the fall of 2003, not long after
Johnson & Johnson's Cypher stent was approved, reports started coming
in about late stent thrombosis -- the sudden (and often fatal) formation
of a blood clot at the site of the stent. This only occurred in a very
small number of patients and, as we suggested then and several studies
have since proven, the cause of some of this thrombosis is that patients
stopped taking their antiplatelet drugs. Sometimes they were told to
because they needed to have surgery, or a dental procedure. Read the
FDA's warning -- it's even on video.
August 24,
2005 Warning
Letter to Boston Scientific -- Dated August 10, 2005 (source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration)
Yesterday the FDA made public a fairly strong warning letter it had sent
to Boston Scientific regarding problems at its Quincy, Massachusetts
shipping facility in which somehow drug-eluting stents that had been
quarantined for failure to pass a quality control test were shipped to
5 hospitals. Supposedly this occurred when an employee or employees over-rode
a computer block on these items. Charles Rudnick, a spokesperson for
the company stated that "None of the products resulted in any harm
to patients." He continued that they were shipped in error and,
in most cases, had been retrieved from the hospitals immediately. Boston
Sci receives FDA warning -- MarketWatch.com
August
16, 2005 Studies
Give Edge To J&J Stent (source: Forbes)
Two studies to be published this week in New England Journal of Medicine and Journal
of the American Medical Association show that J&J's Cypher is
superior to Boston Scientific's TAXUS drug-eluting stent. Previously
reported at the ACC in March, the SIRTAX and ISAR-DIABETES full studies
will appear in NEJM, while a meta-analysis of almost 4,000 patients by
Dr Adnan Kastrati of Munich will be published in JAMA. While the differences
between stents are not large, they do seem to exist. One problem, however,
is the supply of Cypher stents in all sizes is still not up to full levels;
also in some cases, the Taxus seems easier to deliver to the artery. American
Journal of Cardiology Study Finds TAXUS Has Lower MACE Rate Than Cypher (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
Showing the exact opposite of the above trials and analyses, a small
Dutch study of 293 patients showed that Taxus bested Cypher in 2 of 3
areas known as MACE (Major Adverse Cardiac Events) and basically tied
in the third. New
meta-analysis rekindles Cypher-Taxus debate, fueled by publication
of SIRTAX and ISAR-DIABETES (source: theheart.org -- registration required) A detailed report on these two studies with opinions from various
cardiologists, our favorite is from Ron Waksman of the Washington
Hospital Center who stated, "I think a large part of this is
propaganda. Cordis is trying to show that its stent is superior to
Boston Scientific's, and Boston Scientific is trying to show that
there is no difference. So each company will pick up the pieces from
the studies that fit their statements. When we look at our own Washington
Hospital Center data, which now cover 2,500 patients, they do not
show any difference between the two stents."
July 31, 2005 Medtronic
Receives CE Mark Approval For Endeavor™ Drug-Eluting
Coronary Stent System
Mark that number three -- Medtronic's Endeavor drug-eluting stent has
now achieved the significant approval of the European community and the
company is looking toward an U.S. approval next year, making the endeavor
the third DES available. The Medtronics stent, interestingly enough,
is coated with a drug made by Abbott, a company that is developing its
own drug-eluting stent. (source: Medtronic, Inc.)
July 19, 2005 Stent
maker says legal disputes not major threat
Boston Scientific responds to concerns that its legal disputes with Johnson & Johnson
and Medinol will become significant negatives for the company. (source: Ross Kerber, Boston Globe)
July 14, 2005 Stent
report dismissed
Both Boston Scientific and Federal regulators state that the problems
raised in yesterday's Wall Street Journal article were "not related
to the design flaw that led to a massive recall of the device a year
ago". A Company spokesperson furthermore stated that the number
of problems with balloon non-deflation were "exceedingly low" and
that "You're always going to have problems with a balloon not deflating
or getting stuck." Officials with the FDA agreed and that the reports
are "within expectations" for the device. The Pioneer Press
quotes a stock analyst saying, "It is unclear why this article was
written, given this is an old issue." (source: Jim McCartney, St. Paul Pioneer Press)
July 13, 2005 Boston
Scientific Stent Problems Persisted (source: Associated Press) FDA
sees no more action on stents despite injuries (source: Reuters) Stents
Made by Boston Scientific Showed Problems After 2004
Recall (source: Sylvia Pagan Westphal, Wall Street Journal
-- subscription only) A front page report in this morning's Wall Street
Journal has raised questions about potential problems
with Boston Scientific's Taxus stent, which was recalled
by the company last summer. The article details cases
(since the recall) in which the balloon on which the
stent is mounted failed to deflate quickly, causing injury
and in one or two cases, death to the patient. Failure
of a balloon to deflate is a complex issue, that may
or may not be a problem with the equipment itself --
many factors such as the anatomy of the specific artery,
operator technique, etc. can interact. All devices have
complication rates -- the question is whether the complication
rate for a specific device is out of the ordinary. The
FDA has examined these reports and, as of today, did
not see that the adverse reports warranted any action.
As Mark Landy of the Susquehanna Financial Group pointed
out in the Reuters article above:
" With both drugs and medical devices,
you get bad outcomes from time to time," adding the
Wall Street Journal report followed a series of recent
reports by The New York Times about problems with medical
devices made by Guidant Corp. "It now appears that
medical devices are in cross-hairs of journalists," he
said.
Angioplasty.Org has previously written
about the meaning of product recalls in its article, "What's
A Patient To Do?" -- we will be updating this as
more information is received about the problems that were
raised today.
July 13, 2005 Drug-Eluting
Stents Prove Mettle in Heart Attack Patients
Drug-eluting stents have shown great success in treatment of coronary
artery disease but until now has not been studied in heart attack victims.
This study, published in CCI: Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions, shows very positive results in this population (source: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions)
July
1-2, 2005 Boston
Scientific Announces Patent Infringement Verdict Against
Johnson & Johnson (source: Boston Scientific Corporation) Cordis
to Ask Judge to Overturn Patent Verdict (source: Cordis Corporation) Jury
Finds Infringements on Patents on Stents (source: Barnaby J. Feder, New York Times -- reg required) Boston
Scientific wins suit -- Patent ruling evens score in
legal fight between stent rivals (source: Ross Kerber, Boston Globe)
Another series of articles and company press releases that discuss the
event surrounding today's jury finding that Johnson & Johnson / Cordis
infringed patents owned by Boston Scientific -- these concern the polymer
coating of drug-eluting stents and the so-called "Ding" patent.
Damages will be decided upon later in August, but this now levels the
playing field quite a bit. The last
trial found that Boston Scientific infringed upon J&J's bare
metal stent design. So in the past month juries have found that the patents
for the stent structure, as well as aspects of the balloon-expandable
process, belong to J&J, but that the patents for the polymer drug-coating
process belong to Boston Scientific. This will, in our view, might to
an accomodation down the line, but first J&J is asking the judge
to reverse the jury's decision and also plans to appeal. Stay tuned.
July 13, 2005 Lack
Of Major Heart Device Trials Hurts Sector's Luster
Article "laments" the lack of major clinical trials, such as
the ones for drug-eluting stents and ICDs -- and paints a picture of
the coronary medical device industry in, as Dr. Eric Topol calls it,
the "evergreen phase" -- matured and not much movement. The
article also quotes Paul LaViolette, COO of Boston Scientific, as saying
that catheter-based treatment of carotid narrowing (stroke prevention)
is going to be a growth area. We agree. (source: Daniel Rosenberg, Dow Jones Newswires)
July 6, 2005 Guidant
Begins Enrollment in European Drug Eluting Stent Study
The company announced the first patient enrolled in its SPIRIT II drug
eluting stent clinical study for the everolimus coated XIENCE™ V. The
cobalt-chromium stent is in trials in the U.S. and now in Europe. (source: Guidant Corporation)
July 5, 2005 For
J&J, device rewards outweigh risks--analysts say
A business overview of where J&J is, considering the recent stent
patent rulings and their impending acquistion of Guidant, a company that
has just gone through a much-publicized recall. (source: Susan Kelly, Reuters)
June 28, 2005 Boston
Scientific Heads Back to Court
A recounting of the various "trials" and tribulations that
Boston Scientific is going through with lawsuits involving patnet infringement
from Johnson & Johnson / Cordis, settlement of fines with the U.S.
Department of Justice and now, the opening of the trial dealing with
a long-standing dispute with Israeli-based Medinol. (source: Barnaby J. Feder, New York Times)
June 22, 2005 Guidant
Begins Enrollment in U.S. Drug Eluting Stent Trial
Guidant moves forward with it everolimus drug-eluting stent. Even though
Johnson & Johnson / Cordis plans on acquiring Guidant later this
year, this newest DES trial has begun -- and it is designed to compare
the XIENCE V stent to Boston Scientific's Taxus. (source: Guidant Corporation)
June 21,
2005 Patients
Reap Benefits of Heart Health Advance
This press release from Cordis gives an overview of what the introduction
of drug-eluting stents (the Cypher, in particular) has meant for patients.
In our view, the impact of drug-eluting stents has changed the treatment
pathways significantly from what they were only two or three years ago. (source: Cordis Corporation)
June 21, 2005 Jury
Finds Cordis Patents Infringed by Boston Scientific Stents (source: Cordis Corporation) Boston
Scientific Announces Jury Verdict in Patent Litigation With
Johnson & Johnson (source: Boston Scientific) Jury
Rules Against Boston Sci In J&J Stent Patent Trial (source: Wall Street Journal -- subscribers only) Boston
Scientific infringed J&J patent-jury (source: Susan Kelly, Reuters) Boston
Scientific could face $1B in damages on patent infringements (source: Boston Business Journal)
A series of articles and press releases regarding today's jury decision
that Boston Scientific's stents infringed on two patents held by Johnson & Johnson
/ Cordis. This not unexpected ruling has no injunctive effect on the
current supply of stents (i.e. Boston Scientific will not have to stop
selling its market-share-leading Taxus stent) although the ruling that
the second "Gray patent" is infringed upon by Boston Scientific's
up-and-coming Liberte stent is potentially troublesome. The actual damages
will be decided in another trial in August. Analysts have said that they
could reach $1 billion. (Editor's Note: In a separate case, soon to go
on trial, Boston Scientific is claiming patent infringement against Cordis
for the polymer coating of its drug-eluting stent.)
June
20, 2005 Next-Generation
TAXUS® Liberte™ Coronary Stent System Registry Completes
First Enrollment Phase
The company announced that it has completed enrollment in the transitional
phase of the world's largest drug-eluting stent registry. The OLYMPIA
registry plans to enroll more than 30,000 patients at more than 600 centers
in the United States, Europe and other international locations. (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
June 17, 2005 Medinol
lawsuit heads back to court
Four-years in the making, this dispute has not been resolved through
court-suggested mediation, so on June 27 the parties will find themselves
facing each other in a New York court. (source: Shirely Yom Tov, Haaretz)
June 9, 2005 Cordis
Corporation to Appeal Court Ruling (source: Cordis Corporation)
A Dutch court has ruled against Cordis and for Boston Scientific on a
patent issue stemming from the catheter shaft for their balloon catheters,
used to deliver the Cypher drug-eluting stents. The patent issue did
not involve the stent itself. The company plans to appeal the ruling
and stated, "Given current inventory and expanding manufacturing
capabilities elsewhere, Cordis Corporation does not expect a significant
impact on its ability to supply the ex-U.S. marketplace for these products."
May
31, 2005 DES
Prove Popular, But Docs Say Improvements Still Needed
Reporting on a Guidant-sponsored symposium at this year's EuroPCR course
in Paris, Medical Device Daily gives an interesting picture of the current
and near-future state of drug-eluting stents. Dr. Renu Virmani, a frequent
critic of drug-eluting-stent-mania, found Guidant's Xience V everolimus
stent superior in many ways. (source: Holland Johnson, BioWorld Today Online)
May 25,
2005 Abbott
Launches TriMaxx Coronary Stent and Five New Products for
Vascular Intervention at Paris Course on Revascularization
The company announced that it has launched its next-generation coronary
stent, TriMaxx™, the platform for its much-anticipated investigational
drug-eluting stent, ZoMaxx™, in Europe today. In addition, Abbott also
lauvhed five other vascular products. Chip Hance, president of Abbott
Vascular states, "Physicians in Europe will appreciate TriMaxx' unique
stainless steel and tantalum tri-layer design. Along with the introduction
of TriMaxx, the European launch of five additional products demonstrates
our continuing commitment to deliver high-performing technology that
can be relied upon by physicians to build their interventional practices.
All of our products, including our flagship StarClose™ Vascular Closure
System, are developed with the core intention of improving patient outcomes
and enhancing quality of life." (source: Abbott Laboratories)
May
24, 2005 Conor
Medsystems Announces Positive Twelve-Month Follow-Up
Data From EuroSTAR Pivotal Study
This was a relatively small trial reported at the EuroPCR course, but
the results are interesting. At twelve-month follow-up, the target lesion
revascularization (TLR) rate was 2.9 percent and the rate of cumulative
major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 7.6 percent. There were no reported
cases of stent thrombosis between the cessation of anti-platelet therapy
at six months and twelve-month follow-up. The principal investigators
for this study are Dr. Keith Dawkins from Southampton, UK and Dr. Antonio
Columbo of Milan, well-known to all in the interventional community. (source: Conor Medsystems,
Inc.)
May 23, 2005 FDA
Approves 12-Month Shelf Life for Taxus® Stent System
In a press release, the company announced today that the FDA has extended
the approved shelf-life of its Taxus drug-eluting stent from the current
9 months to 12 -- it is currently 18 months outside the U.S. The company
also notes that "the new TAXUS U.S. shelf life is longer than any
competing product" -- by "any" the company means
the only other competing product, i.e. the Cypher stent, made
by Cordis / Johnson & Johnson. It will be interesting to see if this
announcement is followed by a similar extension for the Cypher -- this
occurred last month when the FDA approved both products for immediate
MRI scanning after stenting within a two week period. The current shelf
life for the Cypher stent is 3 months in the U.S. and 5 months outside
the U.S.. (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
May 17, 2005 Abbott
Enrolls First Patient in Pivotal Zomaxx™ Drug-Eluting
Stent Clinical Trial
The company has enrolled its first patient in the North American phase
of its Zomaxx II trial, approved by the FDA in April. This new stent
uses a drug coating somewhat different than the current "limus" and
paclitaxel varieties -- a coating discovered and produced by Abbott (other
stents use drugs licensed from third parties). Jeffrey W. Moses, M.D.,
who performed the first interventional procedure in the ZOMAXX II trial,
states in this press release, "I found the ZoMaxx stent to be highly
deliverable. It performed superbly during the procedure and appears to
have enough flexibility to make it a compelling candidate for use in
certain difficult-to-treat cases.... ZoMaxx is also clearly visible under
x-ray fluoroscopy, contributing to its ease of use and the ability to
see its excellent scaffolding during and after stent implantation procedures." (source: Abbott Laboratories)
May 17, 2005 Gamble
wins big at Boston Scientific
In a "local firm makes good" story, the company moved into
the top spot on the Boston Globe 100 ranking of the best-performing Massachusetts
companies -- it was the first life sciences company to do so. The article
provides some historical perspective on how Boston Scientific initially
could not afford the $40 million asking price to purchase the company
that made the first cardiac stent in 1993 -- Johnson & Johnson bought
Cordis and is now Boston Scientific's chief competitor. But the big story
is how Boston Scientific successfully dealt with a manufacturing defect
that caused the recall of virtually all its Taxus stents last summer
(read our feature
on the recall) and increased sales by over $2 billion last year. (source: Ross Kerber, Boston Globe)
May 10, 2005 Conor
Medsystems Receives CE Mark Approval for UniStar™ Cobalt
Chromium Stent
The company today announced that its UniStar™ cobalt chromium bare-metal
coronary stent received CE Mark approval in the European Community for
the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions. Conor also announced
today that the company has received ISO certification of its facility
in Athlone, Ireland for the commercial manufacturing of its proprietary
coronary stents including the UniStar stent and the CoStar™ cobalt
chromium paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent, which it hopes to have approved
later this year. (source: Conor Medsystems, Inc.)
May 5, 2005 Guidant
Receives Approval to Begin U.S. Drug Eluting Stent Trial
In it press release, Guidant states that the "SPIRIT III is a large-scale
pivotal clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Guidant's
drug eluting stent system for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
This prospective, randomized, single-blind trial compares XIENCE™ V,
an everolimus eluting coronary stent system utilizing Guidant's cobalt
chromium MULTI-LINK VISION® Coronary Stent System platform, versus
the TAXUS® Express 2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System.
Results of the SPIRIT III trial may be used to obtain FDA approval for
XIENCE(TM) V for the treatment of coronary artery disease. (source: Guidant Corporation)
May 4, 2005 Cook
to Begin First International Trial of a Paclitaxel-Eluting
Stent for Peripheral Artery Disease
With a U.S. trial already underway, Cook Group will expand its efforts
to bring the world's first paclitaxel-eluting stent for peripheral artery
disease (PAD) to market by launching an international clinical trial,
company officials reported today. The global clinical investigation of
Cook's Zilver® PTX™ Drug-Eluting Stent will enroll 760 patients
at up to 50 investigational sites in Europe, Asia, Australia and Canada. (source: Cook Incorporated)
May 3-4, 2005 Coated
stents' blood-clot risk may be higher than thought
Another article on the JAMA article (below) (source: Boston Globe) Incidence,
Predictors, and Outcome of Thrombosis After Successful Implantation of
Drug-Eluting Stents
Abstract of the article published in the May 4 issue of JAMA. The authors'
conclusion is "The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis 9 months
after successful drug-eluting stent implantation in consecutive "real-world" patients
was substantially higher than the rate reported in clinical trials. Premature
antiplatelet therapy discontinuation, renal failure, bifurcation lesions,
diabetes, and low ejection fraction were identified as predictors of
thrombotic events." (source: Journal of the American Medical Association) Drug-Coated
Stents Show Shortfalls
An good article with a somewhat misleading headline -- thrombosis, or
blood-clotting, always has been a concern in the use of drug-eluting
stents. That is why blood-thinning drugs, such as Plavix (clopidogrel)
or ticlopidine, and aspirin are routinely prescribed for patients who
have had drug-eluting stent placement for at least 3 months, and up to
a year in some practices. So a study published in JAMA (link to the abstract
is listed above) of 2,229 patients conducted in 3 German and Italian
hospitals is generating headlines because the "real world" thrombosis
rate is double what has been observed in clinical trials for these devices
-- "double" means 1.3% in this study, as contrasted with 0.4-0.6%
in clinical trials where one would assume post-procedural compliance
was higher. For a perspective on this news, read "Voice
in the Ear" -- our Editor's blog. (source: Ed Edelson, HealthDay) Drug-eluting
stents: some bare facts
A "must read": in an October 2004 letter, commenting on a study
of late-stent-thrombosis, Dr. Eisenberg, of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
discusses the whole topic of stent thrombosis in the era of drug-eluting
stents -- an excellent overview which puts today's headlines into perspective
-- one of the major problems, as reported in the JAMA study from Milan,
is the premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in drug-eluting
stent patients. For those whose do not have a subscription to The Lancet, this
article from Journal Club has a good summary. (source: Mark J Eisenberg MD, The Lancet -- requires subscription
to read)
April 20, 2005 CYPHER® Sirolimus-Eluting
Coronary Stent Receives FDA Approval for MRI Scans Immediately
Following Implantation
Following their approval two weeks ago for the Taxus stent, the FDA is
now satisfied that Johnson & Johnson's Cypher is also safe for immediate
MRI imaging. Patients no longer have to wait two months before undergoing
an MRI test. This announcement means that both drug-eluting stents available
in the U.S. are safe for immedtae MRI. (source: Cordis Corporation)
April
14, 2005 Boston
Scientific Announces FDA Approval and Launch of Liberte™ Coronary
Stent System
In a significant step towards approval of what will almost certainly
be the first second-generation drug-eluting stent in the U.S. next year,
the company announced today that the F.D.A. has approved the Liberte
stent -- the bare metal version -- which serves as the platform for the
TAXUS Liberte stent, already
available in 18 international markets. Boston scientific plans to
launch the new drug-eluting stent in Europe later this year, and hopes
for a mid-2006 approval in the U.S. The FDA approval for the Liberte
stent can be found here. (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
April 12, 2005 Boston
Scientific Announces Start of Enrollment in Groundbreaking
Clinical Trial Comparing Drug-Eluting Stents to Cardiac
Surgery
The company announced that a major clinical trial comparing the Taxus
paclitaxel-eluting stent with bypass surgery (CABG) has begun with the
first patient enrolled at Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier in Massy,
France by Dr. Marie-Claude Morice (who was principal investigator for
Johnson & Johnson's REALITY trial). The SYNTAX Trial will enroll
over 4,200 patients at up to 90 sites in Europe and the United States
and will study patients with triple-vessel and left main disease, the
most complex patient set studied in such a trial. As Dr. Morice stated, ""The
drug-eluting stent revolution has led us to the point where a randomized
comparison of the TAXUS system with surgery in the highest-risk patients
is critical....The results of this study may profoundly change the practice
of medicine." Principal investigators for the study are Professor
Friedrich Mohr, M.D., Program Director of the Heart Center/Cardiothoracic
Surgery, University of Leipzig, Germany and Professor Patrick Serruys,
M.D., Ph.D., Chief of Interventional Cardiology, Thoraxcenter-Erasmus
University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
April 12, 2005 Medtronic
Announces First Patient Enrollment in the ENDEAVOR IV Clinical
Trial
Medtronic announces the final phase of its ENDEAVOR Clinical Program
aimed at gathering clinical data to secure approval for its drug-eluting
stent. The co-principal investigators of the ENDEAVOR IV trial are Martin
B. Leon, M.D. Columbia University Hospital, New York, and David M. Kandzari,
M.D., Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. Endeavor IV compares
the Medtronic stent to the Taxus; Endeavor III is a comparison with the
Cypher and its results are expected to be presented at this year's TCT. (source: Medtronic, Inc.)
April 10, 2005 Guidant
jobs may be at risk in merger deal
There's talk that the impending merger with Johnson & Johnson may
cause Guidant facilities in California to cut staff. (source: Laura Cutland, Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal,
courtesy MSNBC)
April 7, 2005 Abbott
Receives FDA Approval to Begin ZOMAXX II U.S. Drug-Eluting
Coronary Stent Trial
Looking to an anticipated U.S. approval for their drug-eluting stent
in the second half of 2007, Abbott is beginning enrollment of 1,670 coronary
artery disease patients in up to 80 centers. The press release states: "The
trial will compare clinical outcomes in patients who are treated with
Abbott's investigational ZoMaxx drug–eluting coronary stent with
patients who receive Boston Scientific's Taxus™ Express2™ drug–eluting
stent. The primary endpoint of ZOMAXX II is 9–month ischemia–driven
target vessel revascularization, a clinical measure of the need to conduct
another intervention (stent, brachytherapy or surgery) to reopen a vessel
previously treated with a stent." (source: Abbott Laboratories)
March 23,
2005 Conor
Medsystems Receives Conditional IDE Approval From the FDA
to Begin COSTAR II Pivotal Clinical Trial
The company has gained FDA approval to begin a clinical trial of their
unique stent for the treatment of restenosis. The CoStar™ stent
is made of cobalt chromium, not stainless steel, and contains small reservoirs
which contain the drug paclitaxel, the same drug that is used in the
polymer coating of Boston Scientific's Taxus stent, against which it
will be compared. The results of this clinical trial will be interesting
in that the same drug is being used -- just being delivered in a different
way. (source: Conor Medsystems, Inc.)
(Special Section)
TAXUS vs. CYPHER: The Latest Episode of "Stent Wars" Debuts
at the American College of Cardiology Annual Meeting
"All of these trials are
underpowered and unfortunately we are going to get
a lot of confusion when we look at these small underpowered
studies showing big differences."
-- Gregg W. Stone,
MD, Principal Investigator for TAXUS V (March 6, 2005)
"We are...not selecting our
attitude for the patient on only one trial. All that
has to be put in perspective... because there is no
one good and one bad, one ugly and one marvelous. The
reality's not there. We are in small differences and
I think we need much more data to dramatically change
the practice."
-- Marie-Claude
Morice, MD, Principal Investigator for REALITY (March
6, 2005)
March 9, 2005 REALITY,
ISAR-DIABETES and SIRTAX: Trials and Tribulations
Commentary from the Editor of Angioplasty.Org's Blog about the
results of Sunday's drug-eluting stent presentations at the ACC. (source: Burt Cohen, The Voice in the Ear)
March 7, 2005 Boston
Sci Defends Stent's Safety, Will Monitor Issue
Boston Scientific executives respond to results from the REALITY
trial that indicated a higher-than-normal incidence of thrombosis
(blood-clotting) with the Taxus stent. They are monitoring these
safety issues, but said that there isn't a major problem and that
a competitor is blowing things out of proportion. The higher thrombosis
rates seen in the REALITY trial have not been present in the many
thousands of patients studied in other trials of the Taxus stent. (source: Daniel Rosenberg, Dow Jones Newswires, CNN
Money -- no longer online)
March 7, 2005 J&J's
Eleventh-Hour Victory
Adding to the interpretations, Forbes cites a study (SIRTAX) presented
later in the day on Sunday which showed an advantage for the Cypher
stent over the Taxus in several parameters. Presented earlier,
the largest study, REALITY, showed no advantage, but did show a
higher thrombosis (blood-clotting) rate for the Taxus stent. The
SIRTAX study, on the other hand, showed a higher thrombosis rate
for the Cypher. (source: Matthew Herper, Forbes.com)
March 6, 2005 USA
Today: Studies of rival stents suggest one is better Milwaukee
Journal Sentinel: In tests, one stent works
the best
The headlines regarding the various studies presented at the ACC
are interesting, in light of the declaration of Dr. Marie-Claude
Morice, primary investigator for REALITY, the largest of the studies: "...there
are not enough data to select one DES over the other." FYI,
the study, unnamed in the Sentinel article, is the SIRTAX. (sources: Steve Sternberg, USA Today / John Fauber,
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
March 6, 2005 Drug-Coated
Stents Transform Heart Care
An overview from Associated Press of all the studies presented
today at the ACC add up to a clear picture that drug-coated (a.k.a.
drug-eluting) stents represent a major advance in the treatment
of coronary artery disease. (source: Marilyn Marchione, AP Medical Writer)
March 6, 2005 Arts
II Clinical Study Shows Promising Results for the CYPHER® Sirolimus-Eluting
Coronary Stent In Patients With Multi-Vessel Disease
The question posed: can drug-eluting stents match bypass surgery
in the treatment of multivessel disease? In the words of principal
investigator Professor Patrick Serruys, The Thoraxcenter, Erasmus
Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, "For years, physicians
have debated the merits of stent procedures versus coronary artery
bypass grafting in challenging patients with lesions in two or
more vessels...these data suggest that percutaneous procedures
using the CYPHER® Stent may be as effective as surgery in these
patients and much less invasive." (source: Johnson & Johnson / Cordis)
March 6, 2005 REALITY
Trial: Clinical Events at 8 Months
A chart summarizing the clinical events at the end of the 8-month
study period for both the Cypher and Taxus stents. (source: Angioplasty.Org)
March 6, 2005 Johnson & Johnson
Stent Study Falls Short
Although differences in the two stents (CYPHER vs. TAXUS) were
noted in J&J's press release below, most readings of the REALITY
trial are that it failed to prove that one drug-eluting stent was
superior. (source: Reuters)
March 6, 2005 Stent
Test Suggests Not Much Difference Between Rivals
The lead sentence says it all: "The coronary stent showdown
looks like a draw, although one with a good outcome." The
good outcome is the point. Patients have been and will continue
to benefit significantly from drug-eluting stent technology (source: TheStreet.com)
March 6, 2005 TAXUS
V Demonstrates Excellent Safety and Efficacy Results in
Most Challenging Lesions and High-Risk Patients
The company reports that results of a difficult-to-treat patient
population have met the primary goals of the study. These cases
included small vessels, large vessels and long lesions requiring
multiple overlapping stents, according to Boston Scientific, "...the
most challenging lesions and highest-risk patients ever studied
in a randomized, controlled drug-eluting stent trial in the United
States." (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
March 6, 2005 Clinical
Results Of Pivotal Trial Show Endeavor™ Drug Eluting
Stent Provides Significant Treatment Effect In Patients
With Coronary Artery Disease
The final ENDEAVOR II clinical data was very good and will move Medtronic's
entry into the drug-eluting stent arena forward. Dr. William Wijns of
Belgium and Co-Principal Investigator of the trial stated, "Overall
the clinical results are impressive and show that more than 95 percent
of the patients who received an Endeavor stent in the trial required
no further treatment or revascularization at the original treatment site
at the nine month assessment period." (source: Medtronic, Inc.)
March 5, 2005 Conor
Medsystems Announces Positive Angiographic and Clinical
Results for EuroSTAR Drug-Eluting Stent Trial
The company today reported six-month follow-up angiographic and clinical
data from their EuroSTAR study evaluating its CoStar™ cobalt chromium
paclitaxel-eluting stent in a complex patient cohort. The in-stent binary
restenosis rate was 3.4 percent and the in-stent late loss was 0.26 millimeters.
The in-segment binary restenosis rate was 4.7 percent and the in-segment
late loss was 0.07 millimeters. As previously reported, the target lesion
revascularization (TLR) rate was 1.7 percent and the rate of cumulative
major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 4.8 percent. (source: Conor Medsystems, Inc.)
March 4, 2005 Boston
Scientific Announces Completion of Acquisition of Advanced
Stent Technologies, Inc.
AST has designed stent systems that treat bifurcations, the place where
a single blood vessel branches into two. These have historically been
difficult to treat and have had greater chance of recurrence. The company
hopes that this new technology combined with the Taxus paclitaxel polymer
might change those outcomes. (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)
March 3, 2005 Heart
Meeting To Focus On J&J Stent Vs Boston Scientific
An overview from DowJones on the various trials and presentations coming
up this weekend at the annual ACC meeting, which the author states "should
be the most important meeting on drug-eluting stents since 2003." (source: Daniel Rosenberg, Dow Jones Newswire)
March 3, 2005 Boston
Scientific to Announce Results from its TAXUS V Drug-Eluting
Stent Clinical Trial, Studying Most Challenging Lesions
and Highest-Risk Patients
Company press release lists the scheduled presentations and symposia
they are sponsoring around the upcoming American College of Cardiology
meeting in Orlando, Florida. The TAXUS V studies will show 9-month data
from the latest TAXUS trial which, according to the company, looked at "higher-risk
patient population, including patients with small vessels, large vessels
and long lesions requiring multiple overlapping stents -- the most challenging
lesions and highest-risk patients ever studied in a randomized controlled
drug-eluting stent trial in the U.S." (source: Boston Scientific Corporation)